Sunday, July 17, 2011

2013 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500

2013 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500


A bit of tape on these otherwise ordinary-looking cars have rumors flying that the next-generation Mustang GT500 could be twin-turbocharged. (Well, the tape isn’t the sole reason behind the speculation; the intercoolers visible in their grilles are fanning the flames, too.) But we’re not buying it. Superchargers also need intercoolers and, as we previously reported, the next evolution of the Shelby GT500—due as a 2013 model—again will be supercharged. This time, it’ll have upwards of 600 hp.

Ford insiders we talked to pretty quickly deep-sixed the GT500 turbo rumors. While the Mustang seen here wears the body of the top Stang, it’s possible that it could be a test bed for lesser EcoBoost engines. Rumors of EcoBoost Mustangs have persisted since the engines were first announced. However, the Mustang engine roster was just recently overhauled, and there’s not really any room for the turbocharged, direct-injected family in the lineup. The turbo V-6’s output encroaches too much on 5.0 territory, and the current car’s 305-hp naturally aspirated base V-6 is so good—finally—that we can’t see Ford taking a chance and replacing it already.

Stepping into the 600-hp club with the GT500 won’t be an easy move. Our guess is that the cars pictured here are working to help ensure that the harder-hitting Shelby can keep its cool. Development in the auto industry is ongoing; if you ever talk to a hot rodder, he’ll tell you his car is never done—and he’s only got one. Just imagine that cycle for a company that builds more than a million cars a year.

Supercharged 2012 Chevrolet Camaro May Not Be Called Z28

Supercharged 2012 Chevrolet Camaro May Not Be Called Z28


Since July, we’ve had photographic proof that Chevy’s engineers are hard at work on a supercharged version of the Camaro. The hot pony car is slated to receive a version of the blown 6.2-liter LSA V-8 from the Cadillac CTS-V, where it produces 556 hp. The usual questions of “When?” and “How much?” remain open, and we can now add a third to the list: What’s it to be called?

Not So Fast (About that Z28 Name)

Although many—including us—speculated that this range-topping Camaro would wear Z28 badging, GM insiders tell us it isn’t a sure thing. While our sources are tight-lipped on other possibilities, other Z-based historic nameplates could be in the running, such as ZL-1 and IROC-Z. (We don’t think the ’80s are distant enough for the latter to be a good idea.)

Following a recent Chevrolet dealer meeting, one industrious Camaro fan hopped on a popular message board to post that production of the Camaro Z28 would begin on January 1, 2012—although we’re skeptical that the Canadian Auto Workers union wants its crew on the Camaro’s Oshawa, Ontario, assembly line working on a New Year’s Day, let alone one that falls on a Sunday. The rest of the report, however, is congruous with what we’ve heard: The über-Camaro will sport a supercharged 6.2-liter V-8, Magnetic Ride Control likely will be included, the exterior will be styled for maximum inspiration of terror, and the interior will receive modest upgrades.

Improvements for the Rest of Camaro Range

Chevy isn’t looking to do a full-on face lift for the Camaro line—at least not for a few years—but instead is planning to update its neo-muscle car progressively. All Camaro interiors will receive some slight enhancements in the coming year, but GM’s main focus at this point is balancing out the car’s proclivity for understeer. In addition, the V-6 engine in the entry-level Camaro is headed to the massage parlor, where it may be dubbed LFX. Regardless of its christening, the six should emerge with greater efficiency and a very small bump in power from the current 312 hp. (Some Camaro fans have been speculating a jump to 330 or more, but we’re assured the actual increase will be much less.)

It’s not clear whether these evolutionary changes will arrive in time for the special 45th Anniversary Edition Camaro, which arrives this summer. Between prepping that car, launching the convertible this February, updating the V-6, and getting the supercharged model to market, the Camaro team has a busy year ahead of it. We just hope they find time to settle on a name.

2012 Ford Mustang Boss 302, Boss 302 Laguna Seca

2012 Ford Mustang Boss 302, Boss 302 Laguna Seca


Bullitt. Cobra. Shelby. Mach 1. Ford’s charismatic Mustang has taken on many roles, many forms, and many names during its 46-year history, and the company’s modern marketing machine has pillaged pretty much all of them in the past decade. Boss, however, has stayed largely in the shadows, adorning a few track-only specials sold in extremely limited quantities.

The Boss Mustang is hitting the streets once again in the form of the track-oriented Boss 302 unveiled at the Rolex Historic Races at Laguna Seca. According to the company, the 2012 Mustang Boss 302 is the “quickest, best-handling straight-production Mustang ever offered by Ford.” It pays homage to its track-star forebears by lightening and strengthening key components, juicing up the engine, and wrapping it all in the vintage color schemes that Boss Mustangs are known for still today.

A Redux Whose Time Has Come

Aerodynamic changes include a deeper front air dam and a rear spoiler. Not accidentally, the changes stylistically connect the new car to its predecessor, right down to the livery, including Competition Orange, Performance White, Kona Blue, Yellow Blaze, or Race Red. These are offset by white or black C-stripes and a matching roof.

Inside, however, the 2012 Boss 302 couldn’t be less like the original—today’s UPS trucks come with more creature comforts than most track-oriented muscle cars from the late 1960s. The new Boss models receive an Alcantara-covered steering wheel, dark metallic dash and door panels, a black shift knob, and cloth seats with “suede-like” center inserts. The GT500’s Recaro front bucket seats are optional. Eleven pounds of sound-deadening material are missing, to allow more of the engine’s uniquely tuned exhaust sound to fill the cabin.

What a Difference Four Decades Makes

While the ’69 Boss 302 may be the stuff of legends, by modern standards, its (claimed) 290 hp at 5800 and 290 lb-ft of torque at 4300 rpm is less power and only marginally more torque than the 2011 Mustang’s V-6, never mind the brawny V-8 powering the GT. In the Boss, the GT’s 5.0-liter is upgraded with new intake runners, revised camshafts, and more aggressive engine controls, raising output from the 412 hp to 440. Torque drops slightly, from 390 lb-ft to 380.

The power gets to the wheels via a short-throw six-speed manual transmission with a beefed-up clutch, while the rear end packs a 3.73:1 axle ratio and carbon-fiber plates within the limited-slip differential. A Torsen diff is an available upgrade paired with the Recaro seat option.

One of the most interesting features of the 2012 Boss 302 is its quad exhaust system, developed to give the car a unique sound. The two primary pipes exiting the rear handle most of the exhaust gases, while two smaller pipes branch off from the exhaust crossover and exit discreetly along the lower body sides, just in front of the rear wheels, sending gases through a set of metal discs that generate unique sounds. Should the owner live somewhere with more lax noise regulations, the plates can easily be removed in favor of aftermarket dump valves.

Race Car with a License Plate?

In its quest to turn the Boss 302 into what it calls “a race car with a license plate,” Ford upgraded the GT’s suspension with stiffer springs and bushings, adjustable shocks, and a thicker rear anti-roll bar. Ride height drops 11 mm up front and 1 in the rear. As with the original Boss 302, shock adjustment is done manually—in this case via a screw atop each shock tower—among five stiffness settings.

The Mustang’s electric steering system has also been reworked, giving the driver a choice of three feedback settings—Comfort, Normal, and Sport. Traction and stability-control systems are reprogrammed to offer a choice of full engagement, no engagement at all, or an intermediate sport mode.

The 302’s black-painted wheels measure 19 by 9 inches in front and 19 by 9.5 in back; wrapped by 255/40 front and 285/35 rear Pirelli PZeros. The GT’s optional Brembo brakes are upgraded with high-performance pads and unique ABS calibration.

Ford’s performance claims for the 2012 Boss 302 include cornering capability in excess of 1.0 g, shorter stopping distances than provided by the GT—even with its available brake upgrade—and a 155-mph top speed. Ford declined to provide acceleration figures, but the 302 should handily beat the 2011 Mustang GT’s marks of 4.6 seconds from standstill to 60 mph and 13.2 seconds through the quarter-mile at 109 mph. Whatever the time, it will certainly best the ’69 Boss 302’s 6.5 seconds to 60 and 14.9-second quarter-mile at 93 mph. (That seemed much faster back then.)

Lighter and Tighter: Laguna Seca Edition

Additionally, Ford is launching an even more exclusive “Boss 302 Laguna Seca” model for the harder-core buyer. It ditches the rear seat and some creature comforts while additionally stiffening the body and suspension, and carrying over the aerodynamics package from the Ford Racing Boss 302R almost unchanged.

The 2012 Mustang Boss 302 and 302 Laguna Seca hit dealerships sometime in 2011 at a price yet to be determined. Figure around $36,000 for the base 302 and upwards of $40,000 for the Laguna Seca. Considering that Ford isn’t having any trouble finding homes for its $50,000 Shelby GT500s, we expect the limited-edition Bosses to likewise go quickly.

2012 Chevrolet Camaro Z28

2012 Chevrolet Camaro Z28


When we first saw these photos, we were pretty sure this Camaro-shaped vehicle was a Chevrolet, but someone managed to deftly tape over the trunklid badge. How could we be sure? Then we noticed the bow tie on the door, and came to the airtight conclusion that this car is indeed a Chevy. But what’s under the hood?

Luckily, in another sticker-related misstep, someone opened the door and revealed one of the most poorly placed communiqués we’ve ever seen: a tag on the dash that confirms that this is a Camaro Z28—a vehicle often rumored but not officially announced. Even better, the sticker reveals that this mule is powered by a supercharged 6.2-liter V-8 backed up by a six-speed automatic transmission. Chances are very good that this is the Cadillac CTS-V’s LSA powerplant, which is rated there for 556 hp and 551 lb-ft of torque, as opposed to the higher-powered LS9 V-8 from the Corvette ZR1. Chances are equally good that the Camaro Z28 also will be offered with the CTS-V’s six-speed manual. So, in a sense, you can think of the Z28 as the bow-tie version of the CTS-V coupe, and the ultimate in attainable Chevy awesome.

The tape and camo is thwarting our ability to discern all of the styling changes, but we do note a few. The rocker panels might be reshaped, and there’s a new rear fascia with quad pipes sticking out. (The current top-dog Camaro, the SS, sports dual exhaust pipes.) And we bet the mosquito netting up front is hiding some mean-looking grillework. The matte-black rims are wrapped in wide, Goodyear Eagle F1 tires, and there’s some seriously big brake hardware on display.

Obvious competition will come from the 550-hp, supercharged Mustang Shelby GT500 and Dodge’s naturally aspirated Challenger SRT8, the latter of which is expected to be bulking up from 6.1 to 6.4 liters in the near future. Then there are the myriad tuned Camaros; we’ve reviewed both a supercharged Camaro SS from Lingenfelter and Hennessey’s LS9-powered HPE700 Camaro.

And while we usually have to make an educated guess as to when prototypes such as this will appear in showrooms, that info also was revealed by the dash sticker. Expect this awesomest of factory Camaros for the 2012 model year. We predict a Detroit auto show reveal in January, and expect sales to commence by the fall of next year.

2012 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1, Z28

2012 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1, Z28


Contrary to popular perception, there is not just one higher-performance Chevrolet Camaro on the way, but two thumpers. It is ­perhaps instructive to look, as Chevrolet has, at the current Ford Mustang lineup. In addition to the bread-and-butter V-6, V-8, and convertible versions, the Mustang ­corral includes the ground-pounding supercharged Shelby GT500 and the track-oriented, naturally aspirated Boss 302.

Chevrolet will match Ford move for move, first with what company insiders call the “HP” edition. This is the model that until recently had been assumed to get the Z28 badge. It carries the Cadillac CTS-V’s supercharged LSA V-8 engine making at least 550 horsepower, bolted to a six-speed manual. The CTS-V also donates an updated version of its magnetorheological shocks and asymmetrical half-shafts (differing diameters) to reduce axle hop. From the Corvette comes an active exhaust system with a flap that opens at high engine speeds to reduce back pressure. It’ll carry massive, track-ready, two-piece Brembo rotors and new high-perform­ance Goodyear tires, at 285 mm front and 330 mm rear. It should get to 60 mph in less than four seconds. The monster engine will be covered by a bulged and louvered hood, the center section of which is made of that fastest of materials, carbon fiber. The top-shelf Camaro will also have a higher, trunklid-mounted spoiler and a unique front fascia with a deeper chin. Owing to this car’s overwhelming power, the company decided to change its name to the more historically consistent ZL1 badge, as that model was a big-block bruiser, not a track-tuned road racer like the Z28. The ZL1 will go on sale in February of  2012.

More interested in track days than high-tech dampers? Chevrolet plans to have you, and the Boss 302, covered. Around April of  2012, Chevy will release what so far has been referred to by insiders as the “Track Pack.” This significantly stiffened Camaro will be the hard-core version, with handling as its primary focus. That doesn’t mean it won’t get a power upgrade, though. The “Track Pack,” which might inherit the Z28 moniker, could have an uprated iteration of the standard V-8 or a version of the LS7 7.0-liter V-8 from the Corvette Z06. Both high-performance models will—like all 2012 Camaros—carry revised interiors, too.

2012 Chevrolet Camaro Gets 45th Anniversary Edition, Face Lift, and 323-hp V-6

2012 Chevrolet Camaro Gets 45th Anniversary Edition, Face Lift, and 323-hp V-6


The first time we experienced a major oil shock—the Disco-fabulous 1970s—it eviscerated the muscle-car scene, leaving us with neutered behemoths constructed with all the care of a North Korean knock-off Benz. In comparison, as today’s crude oil and prices at the pump again head north, muscle-car fans are still coming out winners. Ford’s Mustang Boss 302 is a track-attacking monster. And now Chevy is actually increasing the standard horsepower in its base V-6 2012 Camaro, from 312 to 323, while maintaining a 30-mpg highway rating.

Happy Birthday to You

For the hard-core Camaro community, though, the bigger news is the 45th Anniversary Edition Camaro. While a 45th birthday is less noteworthy than a 50th, who wants to wait another five years? By then, the Camaro will probably be a wheatgrass-electric hybrid. The 45th Anniversary package is available for the top-spec Camaro regardless of engine, and dresses up the car’s exterior with asymmetric hood and trunk-lid stripes, new-design 20-inch rims, a spoiler, and HID headlamps. Inside, the package splatters 45th Anniversary logos all over the place—seats, dash, instrument panel, steering wheel, sill plates—and trims the seats, steering wheel, shift boot, armrests, and center console in red, white, and blue contrast stitching. Disappointingly—but not surprisingly—it offers no performance upgrades. It should, however, look very sharp at the local Sunday-morning car club, alongside owners clad in Camaro hats, T-shirts, and windbreakers, clutching Camaro key chains and Camaro thermoses.

As for that smaller engine, GM’s 3.6-liter V-6 is its workhorse, powering everything from the Cadillac SRX (as of yesterday) to the Buick LaCrosse. The Camaro’s version is now dubbed LFX (in the past it was called LLT), and it makes 323 hp versus last year’s 312. The engine has longer-duration camshafts and an improved head design with larger intake valves. It drops 21 pounds, mostly thanks to a composite (read: plastic) intake manifold and lighter connecting rods, and Chevy says it is still good for 30 mpg on the highway.

On the dynamic front, engineers went to work on the chassis, sorting the stiff ride of the V-8-powered Camaro SS. The new suspension features retuned front and rear dampers, and new solid anti-roll bars front and rear. You know the drill though—we’ll believe it when we drive it.

Bye, Bye, Miss Steering-Wheel Pie

General Motors was also kind enough to clean up the Camaro’s interior for 2012. Most notably, the deep-dish steering wheel—the bane of people everywhere who like steering wheels—is gone, replaced with Chevrolet’s corporate tiller. The gauges dump the retro font from last year’s car, and the monolithic slab of cheap plastic that used to span the majority of the dash has been replaced with several smaller panels. (We just hope the quality is better.) To deal with the Camaro’s pillbox-inspired visibility problems, Chevy added a standard rear spoiler. Since there will now be absolutely no rearward visibility, a rearview camera system is available; it displays the image on a screen located in the rearview mirror.

If visibility is the only compromise we have to make with the new Camaro—and Chevrolet seems to be trying hard to provide it all in terms of power and economy—then it’s just another welcome sign that the 2010s will be a lot gentler on the auto industry than were the ’70s.

2012 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1

2012 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1


It’s an epic, decades-long battle waged in showrooms, at the race track, at stoplights, and in internet forums. Chevrolet versus Ford, Camaro versus Mustang. Commencing in the mid-’60s, the clash has been marked by tit-for-tat product introductions, as each brand seeks to match its competitor in every conceivable pony-car niche. Currently, the cars face off in the V-6, V-8, and droptop arenas, but the latest Camaro has ceded the high-performance crown to the Mustang and the brutal, 550-horse Shelby GT500. That ends now.

Welcome the reborn Camaro ZL1.

Open Secrets are Hard to Keep

It’s been a bit of an open secret that GM was working on a high-po Camaro to slot above the 426-hp SS model. Spy photos revealed the car’s 6.2-liter supercharged V-8, and most assumed that car would wear the storied Z28 badge. But Chevy’s product planners had something different in mind, and we now know the car will wear the reclaimed ZL1 moniker. (SLP Performance previously held the rights to the historic alphanumerics.)

A quick look back is in order. The 1969 Camaro ZL-1 was one of the ass-kickingest machines to ever roll out of Detroit. Dressed up in nothing fancier than base Camaro trim—including dog-dish hubcaps—that original ZL-1 looked like a measly six-cylinder wimp. Without even an engine-designation badge, its only real giveaway was the factory-installed cowl-induction hood. (Well, until you started it up and brought the aluminum big-block 427 to life.) The car was only available via Central Office Production Order (COPO), which installed the 427 option in the Camaro shell. Just 69 copies were built, and the ZL-1’s official 430-horse output figure was grossly underrated, mainly for insurance purposes. It was a quarter-mile king, and is among the quickest factory-built and street-legal beasts ever created.

Back in the present, the 2012 ZL1 aims to grow the legend, and it comes well prepared with a supercharged LSA V-8, borrowed from the Cadillac CTS-V. Producing an estimated 550 hp—a figure on par with the actual output of the original—and 550 lb-ft of torque from its force-fed 6.2 liters, this burly Camaro is seemingly built to terrorize drag strips rather than road courses, so perhaps ZL1 is more appropriate than Z28. (The Z28 was a racer, after all, competing and winning in Trans-Am.) A short-throw, six-speed Tremec manual is the only transmission.

Aiding driveline longevity and pavement adhesion are a beefed-up driveshaft and differential with asymmetrical half-shafts; the latter twist fat, 305-width ZL1-specific Goodyear Supercar F1 gumballs. The 20-inch forged wheels are 10 inches wide in the front and 11 in the rear, but the overall wheel-and-tire package is 22 pounds lighter than the Camaro SS's narrower 20-inch setup. We (conservatively) estimate the ZL1 will cover the 0-to-60-mph run in four seconds flat, while 0 to 100 mph should be accomplished in 9.9 seconds and the quarter-mile in 12.5. Monstrous two-piece Brembo rotors—measuring 14.6 inches in the front and 14.4 in the rear, and squeezed by six- and four-piston calipers—are the centerpieces of the braking system. The latest adaptive magnetorheological shocks sit at all four corners, and drivers can choose between Tour and Sport settings. The ZL1 also marks the introduction of a new electric power-steering system. Weight is said to be about the same as the Camaro SS's—the stronger driveline added weight, but some was pulled out with stuff like the wheels and hood, so it's roughly a wash—which puts this top-spec Camaro at 3900 pounds or so.

Many More Pieces of Flair

While the sleeper look of the original was awesome, the new ZL1 will be highly differentiated from its lesser kin. Up front, the lower fascia is dotted with brake-cooling ducts and four fog lights, and has a large splitter and a wide-mouth intake. The domed hood is aluminum with a louvered carbon-fiber center section that Chevy says helps downforce, while the rear end gets a larger integrated decklid spoiler and quad exhaust finishers. The exhaust system houses an actuated flap, as on the Corvette, that opens at higher engine speeds to both reduce back pressure and deliver a blood-boiling growl.

The cabin gets a few modest upgrades, including alloy pedal covers, a head-up display, and emblems for the headrests and door sills. Sueded material is applied to the shifter, the new flat-bottomed steering wheel, and the front-seat inserts. The auxiliary console gauges are standard on the ZL1, and feature a boost readout that we wouldn't recommend actually looking at while behind the wheel—keep your eyes on the road, please.

We're told the ZL1 will start around $47K, although Chevy could revise the pricing upward later, and it's unknown if the model will get hit with a gas-guzzler penalty. Unfortunately, we’re going to have to wait to get our hands on this brute, as it doesn't go on sale until February of 2012. So the GT500, which costs $49,495, will gallop on unchallenged for a little longer. And what about the more-racetrack-oriented Mustang Boss 302? Maybe the Z28 will find a place in Chevy’s modern lineup after all . . .

2012 Chevrolet Malibu

2012 Chevrolet Malibu


Chevrolet’s current Malibu was a huge success when the company needed it, winning a place on our 2008 10Best list and proving that the bow-tie brand could build more than monster SUVs and pickup trucks. Now that the compact Cruze, even smaller Aveo, and minute Spark are all in or on their way to production, the Malibu is up for a little refresh.

The current car is sleek enough, but the overall design isn’t particularly elaborate. The 2012 model will change that with a bit more rake to the beltline, echoed by a faint crease in the body side. The nose and tail will see a great deal of change, with huge front-lighting arrays marking a more-chiseled nose. The hood appears to sit on a taller terrace, bearing a stronger resemblance to that of the Buick LaCrosse than to the current car’s. In the tail, we see additional ornamentation around the trunk, which is recessed deeper into the surrounding sheetmetal and plastic. The top of the decklid appears to taper into a sort of flat, ducktail shape, reminiscent of the more-controversial BMW designs of the last decade.

While it won’t look worlds different, the new Malibu will be comprehensively altered beneath the skin. It will join the Buick Regal and LaCrosse on GM’s new Epsilon II platform, an evolution of the current car’s Epsilon I bones. It will be slightly wider and a little taller, alleviating our primary concerns about the interior. Materials used inside the car supposedly will be vastly improved, although we hope the money to do so didn’t come out of the design budget—the stylish cockpit is one of our favorite things about the current car. We expect Chevy will offer a Malibu with the pseudo-hybrid eAssist powertrain to boost the sedan’s fuel economy ratings. And expect to see the HiPer strut system unveiled on the 2010 Buick LaCrosse find its way into top Malibu trim levels.

No doubt there is plenty more for the spies to catch as they stalk the Malibu, and they have plenty of time left to do so: The car’s introduction probably won’t happen until the 2012 Detroit auto show. Stay tuned for more info.

2013 Chevrolet Malibu

2013 Chevrolet Malibu


The D segment—mid-size, to those of you who aren’t automotive product planners—is the car world’s golden heifer. In annual sales terms, this is among the largest classes of vehicles in the United States. “A” grades in the D class are essential for any brand aspiring to sales dominance.

Feeling Hyundai and Ford heat and anxious to thwack perennial mid-size kings Honda (with its Accord) and Toyota (Camry), Chevrolet has a new Malibu poised on the launch ramp for an early 2012 roll-out. Proving that it’s serious about this assault, Chevy has cleared the Malibu’s passport for international travel. The goal is to sell the classically American sedan with the beachy name in 100 countries spanning six continents. Fittingly, then, the Malibu’s introductory hoopla consists of an HD web broadcast concurrent with an unveiling at the Shanghai auto show. GM’s newest mid-size family sedan also will be Chevy’s star attraction at the New York auto show.

Shorter, Wider, and Roomier

Underpinning the new Malibu is an evolved version of GM’s long-running Epsilon architecture, which is found under the Buick Regal, Opel Insignia, and Saab 9-3. The update brings a stiffer body structure, better suspension systems, and more-inviting interior dimensions. While overall length is down half an inch and the wheelbase has been trimmed by 4.5, a 2.7-inch gain in overall width plus 2.5-inch (front) and 2.0-inch (rear) wider track dimensions bring worthwhile gains in hip and shoulder room. The net result is 2.3 additional cubic feet of passenger space, moving Malibu from the bottom to the middle of the mid-size segment. (Passenger volume rises from 97.7 to 100.0 cubic feet, while trunk room rises from 15.1 to 16.3 cubic feet; compared to a maximum of 106.0 cubic feet for passengers and 14.7 cubic feet for cargo in the Accord.) To minimize the inevitable weight gain associated with a wider, better-equipped Malibu, GM engineers specified high-strength or ultra-high-strength steel for two-thirds of the unibody.

A rubber-isolated front cradle supports the powertrain, electrically assisted rack-and-pinion steering, and the lower portion of the strut-type front suspension. In back is a multilink suspension. Vented front and solid rear disc brakes are standard.


May the Fours Be With ’Bu

The state of powertrain affairs is best described as give and take. Anticipating intense interest in maximum gas mileage, Chevy will offer no V-6. There is an all-new, dual-overhead-cam 2.5-liter Ecotec four-cylinder boasting aluminum-block-and-head construction, direct fuel injection, balance shafts, and variable intake- and exhaust-valve timing. While calibrations aren’t final, Malibu chief engineer Mark Moussa says to expect about 190 hp, 180 lb-ft of torque, sub-eight-second 0-to-60-mph acceleration, and an EPA highway mileage rating comfortably over 30 mpg. A 2013 Malibu Eco using GM's eAssist hybrid system was just announced (with EPA estimates of 26/38 mpg), and Moussa told us that at least one other four-cylinder engine is coming. Our guess is that the Malibu’s upgrade engine will be the Buick Regal’s turbocharged 2.0-liter Ecotec, which produces 220 hp. A six-speed automatic transaxle with engineering changes aimed at quicker shifts, improved efficiency, and superior smoothness is standard.

The new Malibu’s evolutionary exterior is conservatively elegant. A more prominent grille, a subtly creased hood, and the decklid’s neatly integrated spoiler are the main visual attractions. Projector headlights and Camaro-like dual-element LED taillights merge the Malibu into the fashion mainstream. Extensive wind-tunnel work has yielded a drag coefficient near the Volt’s 0.28 figure, according to Chevrolet. Various five-spoke wheels ranging from 17 to 19 inches in diameter will be offered.

First-Class Cabin

Chevy designers emptied their piggy banks for the interior. As before, three trim levels will be offered. Cool-blue direct lighting, contrast-color stitching, and accent upholstery welting set a pleasant mood. Eight airbags are standard and second-row side-impact airbags are optional. The radio’s color touch screen hinges up to reveal a six-inch-deep illuminated storage cubby, and an all-new MyLink infotainment system includes both Pandora and Stitcher SmartRadio. The optional-goodies list includes navigation, lane-departure and forward-collision warning systems, and a rearview camera.

Anxious to flush out the old with new and improved products, GM CEO Dan Akerson cracked his whip to advance the Malibu’s introduction by four months. We never had much of a problem with the old model (we put it on our 10Best list for 2008), but we’re pleased to see GM striving hard to make the grade in this important class.

2012 Dodge Avenger R,T

2012 Dodge Avenger R,T


This is a big year for the Dodge Avenger. Like many vehicles beneath the Chrysler umbrella, it starts 2011 with a wholly redesigned interior, as well as a new V-6. The 3.6-liter Pentastar, as the six-shooter is called, is a vast improvement over its predecessor. Its output of 283 hp is an increase of 20 percent, while the improvements in general power delivery and smoothness are nearly unquantifiable.

For 2012, that engine will power the Avenger R/T that is making its debut at the New York auto show. The R/T sees no uptick in output, nor does the calibration of the six-speed automatic transmission change. But the suspension is stiffened slightly all around. Roll stiffness increases 18 percent, while spring rates increase 17 percent up front and “more than 12 percent” (12.3 percent? 8000 percent?) in the rear. Damping rates increase 15 percent up front and “almost 20” out back. Additionally, the 21-mm rear anti-roll bar is 2 millimeters thicker than the regular car’s.

War and Paint

Aesthetic changes are minimal. The R/T gets a body-color grille, black headlight surrounds, unique 18-inch wheels, and Dodge’s “war paint” hash marks on the front fenders. The trunklid gets a spoiler and an R/T badge. The car gets a bit more of a makeover inside, where the bolstered leather seats have Z-stripe inserts and red stitching, as well as “R/T” embroidered in the front headrests. The driver grips a leather steering wheel with red accent stitching and faces a unique gauge cluster with a tach front and center—very important when driving an automatic.

Dodge isn’t quoting a price yet for the R/T, but figure on it being at the top of the Avenger lineup. Remote start and Dodge’s touch-screen-controlled Boston Acoustics stereo system will be among the standard equipment cribbed from the Lux model that previously sat atop the range. Pricing for that car starts around $24,000, so we expect the R/T to come in somewhere around $26,000 or so. While that’s into base Charger territory, the Avenger R/T will have a lot more personality than a stripped Charger. With 260 lb-ft routed to the front wheels, it also will have a lot more torque steer.

2012 Chrysler 300 S, 300C

2012 Chrysler 300 S, 300C


The redesigned 2011 Chrysler 300 has hardly cooled from the heat of the lights at this year’s Detroit show, but Chrysler is pushing onward, adding several new models to the 300 lineup at the New York affair. There, we’re being introduced to the fire-breathing 2012 300C SRT8, plus these new 300 S and 300C Executive Series offerings; they join the V-6 300 and the Hemi V-8–equipped 300C and 300C AWD. What it all means: Whether you’re looking for a 300 with big wheels and a bangin’ stereo, one fueled by righteous and furious anger, or one with fine leather and premium wood trim, Chrysler probably has a model for you.

300 S

While the slick design of the 300 should appeal to customers of all ages, we can see where some might view the sedan as being fit for, well, an older crowd. Chrysler has a solution to decisively broaden the appeal with the new 2012 300 S. The S models are stripped of bright chrome and wood, those elements being replaced with body-colored accents on the fascia and mirrors, a black-chrome grille, black headlight surrounds, and polished aluminum wheels with black accents. Inside, the interior can be finished in black or Radar Red leather, with piano black and matte carbon trim replacing the wood. The standard 8.4-inch infotainment display is the control center for a 10-speaker, 522-watt Beats Audio system supposedly developed by Dr. Dre in conjunction with Jimmy Iovine, chairman of Interscope-Geffen-A&M Records.

The 300 S will be offered in several varieties, and it marks the return of the V-6/AWD pairing to the 300, as S customers can opt to have all four wheels powered by either the 292-hp six or the 363-hp Hemi V-8. When ordered with AWD, the S comes with 19-inch wheels and 235/55-19 all-season rubber. Rear-drive S sedans also can be spec’d with either the V-6 or V-8, and either option gets 20-inch rollers. V-6 models will come with the new ZF-sourced eight-speed automatic transmission with steering-wheel-mounted paddle shifters, a transmission we expect will be attached to all 2012 V-6 300s. V-8 buyers are stuck with the old five-speed auto for now, but do get the new paddle shifters. The S models will go on sale this fall.

300C Executive Series

Looking to inject some extra lavishness into the 300C, Chrysler has created the Executive Series. Available with rear- or all-wheel drive, the Hemi-only Executive aims to offer the exotic materials of Italian luxury cars, says Chrysler. Beginning with a 300C fitted with most of the trimmings, the car is then treated to either Mochachino or Black Poltrona Frau “Foligno” leather on the instrument panel and cluster brow, center-console side panels, and upper door panels. The seats are stitched with Nappa leather in a two-tone color combo of your choice, and the upscale accouterments are finished off by hand-sanded brown or gray wood that displays its natural pores. On the outside, the chrome trim is replaced with clearly superior “platinum” chrome, and the car gets unique polished 20s. No word yet on pricing, but we expect the top-spec AWD Executive Series to hit at least $50K when it and its rear-drive sibling go on sale at the same time as the S models.

2012 Volkswagen New Mid-Size Sedan Rendered

2012 Volkswagen New Mid-Size Sedan Rendered


What it is: A U.S.-built replacement for the slow-selling Passat. Larger and less expensive than VW’s current mid-sizer, the new car is aimed directly at the mainstream Honda Accord and Toyota Camry customer.

Why it matters: VW needs to increase North American sales and profits. The Passat and the CC are too costly and small to do well against the Camry and the Accord. The new plan: Make it bigger and cheaper to produce while maintaining VW’s autobahn-bred character.

Platform: Its new, transverse-engine, front-drive platform will be shared throughout the VW empire. The New Mid-Size Sedan (NMS) will be the largest vehicle on this flexible architecture.

Powertrain: VW’s familiar 2.5-liter five-cylinder and a turbocharged 2.0-liter four show up.  A 2.0-liter turbo-diesel would make sense should VW decide to take on the Camry and Ford Fusion hybrids.

Competition: Chevrolet Malibu, Ford Fusion, Honda Accord, Hyundai Sonata, Kia Optima, Nissan Altima, Toyota Camry.

What might go wrong: It may be a good car, but VW has never been a real player in the mid-size mainstream game, and sales could be disappointing.

Estimated arrival and price: Built in Chattanooga, Tennessee, the NMS should arrive in late 2011 as a 2012 model. Expect pricing to mimic the Toyota Camry’s ($20,000 to $30,000), which would make it barely more expensive than the Jetta.

2012 Volkswagen Passat,New Mid-Size Sedan Images Surface

2012 Volkswagen Passat,New Mid-Size Sedan Images Surface


While Europeans have already seen their next-generation Passat, we in North America are still waiting for the formal introduction of what VW has been calling its “New Mid-Size Sedan.” We won’t have to wait long: Its debut is scheduled for the Detroit auto show but a month from now. But there’s nothing wrong with a (possible) sneak peek, is there? Indeed, the pictures you see here—which come by way of an Italian car blog, with no guarantees of their provenance—seem to be the first camo-free look at VW’s upcoming Accord fighter.

Much like the spy photos and renderings we’ve seen of the NMS thus far, the sedan seen here is plainly styled and looks much like the recently introduced Jetta. In fact, the only exterior detail of note is the Hoffmeister kink in the C-pillar, an elegant if common design touch that’s executed here in a way that reminds a bit of the C-pillar on the Infiniti M.

Customers should be able to choose from VW’s 2.5-liter five-cylinder engine, the firm’s erudite 2.0-liter diesel four, and the corporate 2.0-liter gasoline-drinking turbocharged four, which appears in everything from the GTI to the Audi A4. VW has hinted at the possibility of a 1.8-liter engine from the latter’s European engine lineup, as well, but it seems unlikely.

This 2012 Passat—or whatever it’s eventually called—will be Volkswagen’s attempt to challenge mainstream family sedans like the Accord, Sonata, and Camry head to head, delivering more space at a much lower price than did the outgoing Passat. This new model is expected to start at around $20,000, while the 2010 Passat required a minimum of $28,000 for the honor of taking one home.

You can see two more images of this VW at jokeforblog.blogspot.com, and we’ll have official NMS pictures and specs in the coming weeks.

2012 Volkswagen Passat FD

2012 Volkswagen Passat FD


Let’s get one thing straight: Tennessee is not Germany. If you haven’t previously stopped to consider this remarkable fact, we suggest you take a moment to ponder it. Nashville isn’t Stuttgart, Chattanooga isn’t Wolfsburg, and that eight-footlong snake encased in Lucite and mounted in a souvenir shop near Lynchburg (population 6362, including Little Richard) isn’t a graffiti-covered piece of the Berlin Wall.

You are forgiven if the snake threw you off.

So Tennessee is not Germany, but this fall, you’ll be able to waltz into one of the state’s Volkswagen dealers and drive off in a 2012 Passat built by local labor. This is the first time VW has assembled a car in America since the 10-year crap explosion that was its New Stanton, Pennsylvania, plant (1978–1988). That facility, you may remember, cost Pennsylvania nearly $100 million in incentives and produced both perpetual labor disputes and sloppily built Rabbits that collapsed under the weight of their own stench. When the plant shut down in 1988, it was making about 60,000 cars a year, less than half its capacity.

The hypermodern new plant, crafted to avoid such problems, is located in Chattanooga. Overjoyed at winning the bid, the state of Tennessee built VW its own exit off Interstate 75 and coughed up $577 million in incentives. The facility sits about 12 miles northeast of downtown ’Nooga on the site of an old munitions factory.

That last bit is fitting, as the Passat is a key part of Volkswagen’s explosive American- growth goals. VW wants to sell 800,000 vehicles here by 2018, up from last year’s 256,830. This is a huge—some would say terrifying—leap, one that won’t come from throwing cash on the hoods of a few Jettas. VW is thus remaking its lineup in what it believes to be our image. First came the larger, cheaper 2011 Jetta, which is selling at a blistering pace. Now we have the ’12 Passat, which is longer than the outgoing model, is styled like a bar of soap, and will likely cost about $7000 less than its predecessor when it hits dealers this fall. The folks in Wolfsburg apparently think we’re all penny-pinching lardbutts. Perhaps. We’ll tell you what we think, but you should pay us $5 first and wait until we finish our bacon-fat sandwiches.

The Passat’s launch took place on the roads between Chattanooga and Nashville, a serene, rolling land of tumbling hills and lifted pickup trucks. The VW’s white-bread curves blend in here, but they’d blend in anywhere, which is kind of the point. The new length is mostly between the wheels, with the wheelbase up 3.7 inches. VW gives an additional inch of legroom to the front and 1.4 inches to the rear. The Passat’s back seat now offers more legroom than those of the Toyota Camry and the Honda Accord. This is nothing if not on purpose: During the press conference, Volkswagen executives rang out the phrase “sized for America” like a team cheer, which just made us think of Sansabelt slacks. You have to wonder how far this Stars-and-Stripes theme will go. (Rumor has it that VW wanted to kick off the 2011 Detroit auto show with cowboys on horseback. Thankfully, someone said no.)

Still, the most interesting part is how anal-retentively VW has tailored this Passat for our commonwealth. The rest of the world, including Europe, gets a face-lifted version of the 2005–2010 car. The version you see here will be built and sold in North America and nowhere else. It has three bars in its grille instead of two—a last-minute addition—because focus groups felt the Hyundai Sonata’s nose looked spiffier. We get three engines (the German-market Passat offers seven), all of which have been seen before: a 170-hp, 2.5-liter five; a 140-hp, 2.0-liter turbo-diesel four; and a 280-hp, 3.6-liter 10.6-degree VR-6. There are just 16 build combinations, down from 128 in 2009, aimed at thinning special orders. And because front-wheel drive rules this segment, four-wheel drive is off the menu. Same for a wagon.

Struts support the front end, as is the class norm. At the rear, there’s an independent multilink suspension similar to what lives in the European Passat. The 2.5-liter model gets either a five-speed manual or a six-speed automatic, but the TDI can be had with a six-speed stick or DSG dual-clutch automatic. The 3.6 is only available with the latter because—you guessed it—VW says U.S. V-6 takers don’t want a clutch pedal.

Oy, we’re a fun bunch.

Our seat time was limited to TDI and 2.5 models, both equipped with two-pedal transmissions, 17-inch rubber, and top-zoot SEL trim. Each sucked up Tennessee’s undulating pavement with ease, the only real suspension flaw being a bounding, mildly underdamped nose on the five-cylinder car. Think of the way an inflatable punching clown rebounds. The chassis is otherwise buttoned down and nimble, with mild understeer at the limit and moderately intrusive stability control that can’t be turned off. The brakes are predictable and linear in feel, and though the pedal gains a bit of travel under hard use, performance never seems to suffer.

Engine choice here is a matter of taste. The heavier TDI (3350 pounds versus the 2.5’s 3300) is the rowdier of the two, with livelier steering, the typical diesel bloom of midrange torque, and the DSG’s giddy, right-now shifts. The five-cylinder’s relative torque deficit and heavy, low-speed steering mean it isn’t as much fun to spank down city streets, but the gap is narrowed by the diesel’s maddeningly upshift-happy gearbox. It doggedly yanks you into a higher gear and away from grunt whenever possible. Blame the TDI’s 43-mpg highway fuel-economy rating.

Amazingly, for a car that just had thousands of dollars ripped from its street price, the Passat’s interior is respectable. The back seat is big enough for two grown men to live out of. The optional 400-watt Fender audio system, with a sound profile an engineer predictably described as “purposely middle-of- the-road,” is punchy and accurate enough to please almost everybody. You see the frugalizing in a couple of places—a glove-box interior finished like a kid’s lunchbox, a cupholder lid sharp enough to double as a prison shiv—but overall, things are on par for the class. There’s none of the packed-with-goodies feel of a Sonata or an Accord, but hey, subtlety is underrated.

In the end, though, it’s the Passat’s flavorless styling that sticks in your craw. (Or is that gristle from the fat sandwich?) It’s fitting that the rear three-quarter view has a lot of Chevy Impala in it; from a certain perspective, this car—populist, affordable, patently inoffensive—is the world’s greatest Impala. Given what VW is trying to accomplish, that’s meant to be a compliment.

Note: Volkswagen representatives do not like it when you tell them this. They grow narrow-eyed and stare into the distance like Davy Crockett. Perhaps they’re looking for snakes.

2012 Volkswagen Passat

2012 Volkswagen Passat


Let’s get the name out of the way first. As expected, the car Volkswagen has been referring to as the New Mid-Size Sedan will be badged a Passat. We already saw a new Euro-market Passat unveiled in Paris a few months ago, but this one is different. It’s been designed for Americans, and will be built here, too. We’re getting our first look at the car at the 2011 Detroit auto show.

Meet the Jetta’s Big Brother

So why the bifurcation in the product line? This new Passat, along with the recently launched Jetta, is expected to make up a good portion of its planned 800K U.S. sales by 2018. The goal is a very lofty one, but to make the Passat more popular—just 12,497 of the last one were sold here in 2010—VW is growing its mid-size sedan and lowering the price to go after the segment leaders. To that end, the company promises “accessible German engineering” at a base price of around $20K. (Expect lots and lots of advertising in this vein.) Unlike the Jetta, which was launched globally with some mechanical and interior changes for the U.S. market, this Passat was developed entirely as a separate car. We’re happy to report that it retains a multilink rear-suspension setup, unlike the Jetta, which is saddled with a torsion-beam axle for U.S. consumption.

We’d already seen some leaked shots of an uncovered 2012 Passat late last year, and so the official photos provide no surprises; the car looks like a stretched version of its Jetta sibling. Up front is the VW corporate grille, and the rear gets anonymous-looking, Jetta-ish taillights that could also have you mistaking the car at night for a BMW 3-series or a Honda Accord. The lines are clean but subdued, a result of the mass-market play. Nearly four inches have been added between the wheels versus the last Passat, which enabled a larger back seat to sate American desires.

The Power Play

The engine lineup is a VW engine nerd’s dream, and is unique among mid-size sedans. Base models will get the 2.5-liter five-cylinder that sees duty in the Jetta, among others, here putting out the same 170 hp and 177 lb-ft of torque. It’s the first time this engine has been put in a Passat and could be seen as a dastardly cost-cutting measure if this powerplant, with its most recent improvements, weren’t so likable. A five-speed manual transmission is standard with a six-speed automatic as an option. Fuel economy is estimated at 21 mpg city/32 highway with the manual and 22/31 for the automatic.

The Passat TDI returns to the U.S. lineup after a several-year absence, packing VW’s familiar 2.0-liter four-cylinder turbo-diesel with 140 hp and 236 lb-ft of torque. A manual again will be standard here, and a six-speed DSG dual-clutch automatic will be optional. VW projects fuel economy of 31 mpg in the city and 43 on the highway with either transmission, as well as an 800-mile range. Both of those fuel-economy numbers are one higher than VW sees in the Golf and Jetta TDI models; we're told aerodynamic efficiency and tweaks to transmission internals are to thank for the larger car's superior projected economy.

At the top of the Passat lineup will be a 3.6-liter narrow-angle V-6 making 280 hp and 258 lb-ft of torque. This VR6 engine is paired solely with the six-speed DSG. The segment’s current power leaders, if you’re keeping score, are the 274-horse turbo four in the Kia Optima and Hyundai Sonata and the 283-hp Pentastar V-6 in the Chrysler 200. VW forecasts EPA ratings of 20/28 mpg for the Passat's 3.6-liter.

All the Trimmings

Just as the engine lineup will try to satisfy mileage junkies, power fiends, and the mainstream alike, VW’s comprehensive list of standard and optional equipment for the 2012 Passat should cover all the bases. The car will be offered in three trim levels: S, SE, and SEL. Included in the $20K base model—which, it should be noted, is about eight grand cheaper than today’s base Passat 2.0T—are features like automatic climate control and Bluetooth connectivity. Options will include 17- and 18-inch wheels, wood trim, leather upholstery, power seats, navigation, a Fender-branded sound system, and keyless entry and ignition. The Easy Open trunk, which allows key holders to wave their feet under the rear bumper to pop the lid, is the European Passat’s marquee feature, but is noticeably absent here. We are told that it could be added in the future.

And speaking of future options, a decision has yet to be made about a Passat hybrid, but it remains a possibility according to Toscan Bennett, VW of America’s vice president of product. Bennett expects the Passat and Jetta to sell in similar numbers, and he and the rest of the VW team hope they’re big ones. Final pricing will be available this spring, and the cars go into production at the company’s new Chattanooga, Tennessee, plant in the third quarter of this year. We’ve lamented the latest Jetta’s lost personality, but here’s hoping its Americanized big brother contains at least a modicum of the old VW mojo.

2012 Volvo S60 and XC60 R-Design

2012 Volvo S60 and XC60 R-Design


For Swedish performance aficionados who remember the Volvo R sedans and wagons from the ’90s and early 2000s, Volvo’s recent R-Design packages left much to be desired. Rather than increase power, those add-ons were being limited to stiffer suspension bits, flashy wheels, and sportier interior and exterior trim. Somewhere a pale yellow 850R wagon may be cracking a smile, though, as Volvo’s upcoming 2012 S60 R-Design and XC60 R-Design mark the return of power upgrades to the Volvo fold.

Both vehicles gain 25 hp and 29 lb-ft of torque, bumping output of Volvo’s ubiquitous T6 turbocharged 3.0-liter inline-six to 325 hp and 354 lb-ft of torque. We clocked the 300-hp S60 T6 to 60 mph in just 5.5 seconds and a 281-hp XC60 T6 AWD (the XC60 got the 300-hp T6 for 2011) in 6.5; the R-Design models should certainly improve on those figures. All the grunt gets routed to the pavement through a six-speed autobox and Volvo’s all-wheel-drive system. Instead of using a trick torque-vectoring differential, Volvo’s Corner Traction Control uses the stability-control system to help handling by braking the inside wheel during cornering, transferring power to the outside wheel.

Already the most entertaining Volvo steer in some time, the rest of the S60's R-Design-ification includes the addition of a front strut-tower brace, monotube rear dampers, stiffened and lower springs all around, and stiffer rear suspension bushings. The attitude of the lower ride height is matched by a set of attractive 18-inch wheels, a more-aggressive front fascia with a piano-black grille, and a tasteful rear lip spoiler that lives above a pair of larger tailpipes. The XC60 R-Design has existed since last year, albeit sans the more powerful engine, and so it already had the stiffened suspension, quicker steering ratio, and sporty trim bits that are now being added to the S60 version. The interiors of both cars have R-Design steering wheels, icy-cool blue-hued gauges, and more-supportive sport seats.

Of course, the full suite of Volvo’s latest safety tech is available, including Pedestrian Detection with Full Auto Brake and Collision Warning with Full Auto Brake—both radar-based systems can slow or stop the car if it determines a collision with a pedestrian or other object is imminent. City Safety, which can slow or stop the car from up to 19 mph in the face of an impending collision, is standard on both R-Design models. Pricing comes in at $43,150 for the S60 R-Design and $44,025 for the XC60 R-Design. Volvo may have largely turned its back on performance in recent years, but these two R-Designs seem to prove that the engineers in Gothenburg still care about more than avoiding accidents.

Volvo Concept Universe

Volvo Concept Universe


Let's get the complaining out of the way. The Volvo Concept Universe unveiled at the Shanghai auto show is styled with all the innovation of a Top 40 pop song. To some, the front end looks like a Swedish take on the 2002 Lincoln Continental concept’s; others see hints of Jaguar XJ in the rear end.

Getting past the shape, the Concept Universe communicates two important messages. First, it underscores that by universe, Volvo really means China. The company's new owner, after all, is China-based Zhejiang Geely Holding Group. Volvo's Chinese sales are fairly strong, and the management is desperate to grow its sales in the hot luxo-car market there. That's why Volvo CEO Stefan Jacoby says of the Concept Universe, “We will listen very carefully to what the Chinese car buyers think of the design. Later, we will also show the Concept Universe in other parts of the world.” Gee, thanks.

Of greater relevance for those of us not residing in the People's Republic of China, is the new platform underpinning the Concept Universe. Volvo calls it Scalable Platform Architecture, and we should see it again beneath several—if not all—upcoming Volvo models. Volvo is mum on such trivialities as possible application, size range, and engineering details for the time being; we'll have to be satisfied with the promise of the concept’s designer, Jonathan Disley, that the interior is more spacious than that of the S80 on sale now.

Jacoby has previously said that his company needs to move away from pitching cars as “premium” models, because this language is too heavy on the marketing fluff. So it was with great relief that we found the press materials for the Concept Universe entirely devoid of that word, instead harping on “luxury.” Although Volvo has a history of successfully flogging its models as the ultimate luxury cars in Communist countries—the North Koreans still tool around in 240s, and East German elites in the 1980s lived in a gated community jokingly referred to as Volvograd—China's shoppers are increasingly demanding. The next-gen Volvos that will grow from this Concept Universe have to live up to the marketing, whether they're called premium, luxurious, or something else.

2012 Subaru Impreza Shown Ahead of NY Debut, 36 mpg Highway Claimed

2012 Subaru Impreza Shown Ahead of NY Debut, 36 mpg Highway Claimed


Two weeks ahead of the 2012 Subaru Impreza sedan’s full reveal at the New York auto show, the company has released this profile shot. From what we can see here, the production car will carry over many of the styling cues previewed by the concept version shown at last fall’s Los Angeles auto show. This includes the sleeker profile, prominent fender bulges, and chiseled front and rear corners, all of which are cool by us—we just hope the overall impression of “Mazda Cruze” is less pronounced when we see more angles.

Subaru also announced its highway fuel-economy estimate for the four-door: 36 mpg, an impressive figure for something with standard all-wheel drive. Subie didn’t specify, however, whether that number will correspond to Imprezas equipped with a manual or automatic (likely continuously variable) transmission. Either way, figure on somewhat less-impressive city mileage, as the engine will be forced to spin up the all-wheel-drive hardware more often in urban situations where vehicle speeds are more varied.

The huge jump expected in mileage—from 26 and 27 mpg highway for today’s manual and automatic Imprezas—comes courtesy of the company’s new flat-four engine. (Check out our full write-up of the engine.) While a 2.5-liter variant of that mill already has found a home in the Forester, we expect that the Impreza will receive a 2.0-liter. Engines in this new family don’t add much (if any) power compared to the units they replace, but they do employ numerous friction-reducing measures and improved breathing and cooling.

Should the EPA confirm Subaru’s 36-mpg estimate, the company brags that the Impreza will be the most fuel-efficient all-wheel-drive automobile on the market—at least until a dozen automakers roll out gas-up-front, electric-in-the-back all-wheel-drive compact hybrids in the next few years. For now, you can bet your best, most broken-in Birkenstocks that Subaru will be beating that particular drum pretty heavily once 2012 Impreza marketing and sales start later this year.

2012 Subaru Impreza Spied Completely Uncovered

2012 Subaru Impreza Spied Completely Uncovered


Subaru’s brass was only prepared for us to see the silhouette of its new all-wheel-drive, 36-mpg compact sedan—but that hasn’t stopped our army of intrepid spy photographers from catching the 2012 Impreza in the buff today.

The new Impreza borrows quite a bit of styling from its older sibling, the Legacy—especially the headlights and the muscular rear haunches. Beyond that, picking out the design features that are reminiscent of other cars turns into a game of I Spy as played by the Micro Machines spokesman and his family. The grille looks like the Cruze’s! The greenhouse reminds me of the Saturn Ion’s!

In truth, the Impreza is one of the few cars with design that almost doesn’t matter. Most buyers will be more interested in the all-weather traction and the excellent claimed fuel economy. A smaller set of buyers will be drawn to the Impreza’s evil twin, the WRX. And while this new Impreza should clean up nicely when fit with a wide-body kit and massive rims, history tells us that even when the WRX is a bug-eyed beast, buyers are lured to its beautiful performance.

2013 Mini Cooper

2013 Mini Cooper


Mini’s upcoming hardtop isn’t as inappropriately named as is Mountain Dew—seriously, on what mountain does Hi-Liter-colored sugar water condense?—but when the next generation of the hatchback arrives in 2013, it’s going to be rather less mini than it is today.

As we see with this test vehicle, caught by our ace spy photographers, BMW is well into development of the next-gen Mini, which will share its front-wheel-drive platform with the next-generation BMW 1-series. (This is not to be confused with the Europe-only face-lifted 1-series that just dropped; that car remains rear-wheel drive for a few years.) We’re told that the styling already has been finalized—and it was done so under the brand’s previous design director, Gert Hildebrand, who oversaw every modern Mini up until that point. (His replacement, Anders Warming, already is at work penning the cars that will arrive following this one.)

But don’t take everything shown in these pictures too seriously. That apparent small third door? It’s just camo. This is a regular Mini three-door hatchback, not a Clubman replacement. In fact, we feel confident that the regular model’s growth will enable a rear seat large enough to take a next-gen Clubman off the table; the Countryman will continue to serve those customers who insist on a more-practical Mini.

There’s yet more fiction in these spy photos: the BMW 1-series–esque dash. Ask a Mini spokesperson what the brand’s core “values” are, and you’ll hear about—cliché alert—go-kart handling, personalization, and, yes, a central speedo. Those won’t change, and the sober interior present in these spy shots is just a dummy, albeit three-dimensional proof that the Mini and 1-series are set to merge underneath the skin.

With this car-laboration in mind, we expect the next-gen Mini to follow the 1-series in offering a powertrain lineup chock full of small turbocharged engines. In addition to four-cylinders, BMW will add a three-cylinder option to both cars, although it’s unclear whether Americans will be able to opt for an odd number of pistons in their Mini.

Before you go reaching for SSRIs to treat your WhyMustEverySuccessiveGenerationofCarsGrowBiggeritis, keep in mind that part of the reason that the core Mini will grow—in addition to taking a bit more fight to cars like the Volkswagen Golf in Europe—is to make space at the bottom of the range for an actually mini Mini. That vehicle will be conceptually similar to the Rocketman, which recently was approved for production.

The Mini brand may no longer be completely honest in name, but its products are (almost) all fun to cane. We expect the next-gen Mini hatch to be no different. We’re hopeful, at least, that it will taste better than Mountain Dew.

car, 2012 Mini Cooper, Cooper S, John Cooper Works Coupe

car, 2012 Mini Cooper, Cooper S, John Cooper Works Coupe


Mini prides itself on being a trendsetter, although in this case it’s merely jumping aboard the latest industry bandwagon, releasing information on an upcoming model and accompanying it with official “spy” shots. Annoying as this practice is, at least we now have official confirmation of what we’ve pretty much officially known for two years now, that the upcoming Mini Cooper Coupe will be more or less a Cooper hardtop, only with less greenhouse and half the seats.

Thanks to the remaining camouflage—which looks remarkably mullet-like—we can’t see the final surface treatment of the production coupe, although it’s relatively obvious that it is nearly identical to the Mini Coupe concept from the 2009 Frankfurt auto show. The backwards-baseball-cap roof, short trunk, wraparound glass, and integrated roof spoiler all remain. Show cars need only go zero mph, but the requirement for high-speed stability on the roadgoing car prompted the addition of a deployable rear spoiler, which appears to be the only significant change. Dimensionally, the coupe covers the same footprint as the Cooper hatchback and loses barely less than an inch in overall height, although the laid-back windshield and chopped windows make the roof look several inches lower. Mini was reticent to offer curb weights, but we expect this car to weigh a bit less than the current Cooper hardtop, which is about 2550 pounds in base form.

The More Things Remain The Same . . .

We do not expect the interior—which is neither visible in these images nor mentioned much in the release—to differ from the hardtop’s, aside from the obvious loss of a bit of headroom and the rear seats. Any compromise in practicality will be offset somewhat by the standard pass-through between the cabin and “variable use” cargo area, which ought to seem pretty darn huge by Mini standards now that the seats are gone.

Mini will offer its new two-seater in the same three trims as the rest of its lineup. The base Cooper Coupe rides on 15-inch wheels and is powered by the naturally aspirated version of the brand’s ubiquitous 1.6-liter four-pot, producing 121 hp and 118 lb-ft of torque. Likewise, the turbocharged Cooper S Coupe and John Cooper Works Coupe follow the same powertrain program that yields either 181 hp and 177-lb-ft or 208 hp 192 lb-ft in other models, each with an additional 15 lb-ft in overboost mode. Like their four-seat brethren, the coupes will offer a choice of six-speed manual and six-speed automatic transmissions, the latter available with paddle shifters.

Mini claims that the base Cooper Coupe will accelerate from zero to 60 mph in 8.3 seconds and hit a top speed of 127 mph. The Cooper S Coupe is estimated to hit 60 in 6.5 seconds on its way to a top speed of 142 mph, with the JCW version coming in at 6.1 seconds and 149 mph, which would make it Mini’s fastest production model ever. For the record, we’ve regularly been able to beat those acceleration times by a few tenths in the heavier hardtop versions, so we expect the two-seaters to accelerate a bit more quickly than Mini claims.

. . . The More They, Er, Remain The Same

Handling should remain riotously fun, thanks to body-stiffening measures front and rear, as well as specifically tuned suspension components. U.S.-bound Cooper S and John Cooper Works models get standard run-flat tires, which are optional on the base Cooper Coupe. Stability control with Mini’s ABS-based “Electronic Differential Lock Control”—basically a poor man’s limited slip—is standard on the JCW version, optional on the others. All together, Mini says that the changes serve to shift the weight distribution forward slightly.

Mini will release more information on the 2012 Cooper coupes—along with camo-free photos, presumably—in coming weeks. Production starts in mid-July in Oxford, England, with U.S. deliveries beginning in October. Mini says that prices will fall somewhere between those of the respective hatchback and convertible models, which would put them somewhere around $22,500 for the base Cooper Coupe, $27,000 for the Cooper S Coupe, and roughly $32,500 for the Works.

And what about the Coupe’s partner in crime, the Mini Roadster? Mini won’t say anything about that now, so expect another sequence of spy shots, official spy shots, official information, and official images and full information soon.

2012 Fiat 500 Sport vs. 2011 Mini Cooper

2012 Fiat 500 Sport vs. 2011 Mini Cooper.


The wide boulevards, endless expressways,  and three-car garages of the United States are not what you might call prime territory for tiny city cars. Sure, they’re big business in Europe, the hatchery that birthed these automotive Peeps, with all major carmakers (including Mercedes-Benz and Audi) looking for a piece of the action. But without the need for space efficiency that guided the development of these runabouts, few Americans seem willing to put up with the resulting trade-offs. Previous efforts largely failed to break Americans out of the small-is-cheap mind-set.  And cars like the quirky-but-joyless Smart Fortwo, and soon the Scion iQ, test the outer limits of American good humor.

Which makes BMW’s accomplishment with the Mini in the U.S. all the more stunning. The reborn Mini Cooper landed in 2002 with a plucky driving personality (especially the supercharged S model), a sensible base price that started in the mid-teens, and a look of tenacity  that leaned heavily on the original 1957 BMC Mini’s styling. It made modern small cars cool for drivers of either gender, and its success went unnoticed by no automaker.

Taking a page from the Germans, Fiat relaunched the 500 in 2007. The nuova was bigger and, like the Mini, wore a retro skin that, according to press materials, exhibited “fashionable Italian flair.” With no means for North American production, Fiat could not finesse the business model to make a U.S. 500 profitable. But then Fiat scooped up 20 percent of Chrysler amid that corporation’s chapter 11 troubles, and its partial ownership gave Fiat access to Chrysler’s Toluca, Mexico, plant. Hello, U.S.-bound Fiats.

The current, second-generation Mini Cooper is sort of the automotive equivalent of  boxer/politician Manny Pacquiao. It can fight a class size up or down. It can thrill as a sport hatch, with numerous go- and look-faster add-ons, or it can serve as a simple transportation vessel. Here we have it punching under its weight as it enters the ring with its Italian opponent.

Cinquecentos come in three flavors: Pop, Sport, and Lounge. The $18,000 Sport comes with a stiffer suspension and sport seats (plus other cosmetic bits), making it the most natural competitor to the Mini. Our highlighter-yellow hatch also came equipped with automatic climate control that is worth every cent of its modest $150 cost and an $850 sunroof that our taller drivers would pay to not have.

Base-level Coopers, which we consider the rough equivalent of the 500 Sport model, start at $20,100, or $2100 more than the Fiat. The cream-and-black test car we wrangled came with randomly applied decals we called, affectionately, warts. Of the $3500 in options, we could do without the $250 stickers and the $1500 Value package (an iPod connector and a body kit), but we absolutely require the $1000 Sport package and the $250 center armrest. We could go either way on the $500 adaptive xenon headlights.

2012 Mini Inspired by Goodwood

2012 Mini Inspired by Goodwood


Multinational corporate intertwinings make for some creative uses of brands and parts. Within the BMW Group, Rolls-Royce builds its smaller model—the Ghost—using a few pieces of the BMW 760Li. Now Rolls is really downsizing, as it has partnered on a version of BMW’s other iconic Brit, the Mini.

The luxury runabout—to be unveiled at the Shanghai auto show—is officially called the Mini Inspired by Goodwood, Goodwood being the home of Rolls-Royce’s factory. Mini will offer 1000 copies in the spring of 2012. It’s a Mini Cooper S underneath, but with Rolls-specific detailing inside and out. While it has the Cooper S’s turbo four, that model’s scooped hood has been swapped for the Mini Cooper D’s more understated bonnet. The rest of the monochromatic exterior’s trimmings are equally as modest, with some normally optional chrome and “Inspired by Goodwood” fender plaques being the only attention-getting add-ons. Even the 17-inch wheels are standard Mini catalog parts. Rolls-Royce Diamond Black metallic paint is standard while Mini’s Reef Blue metallic will be optional.

Sadly, the Doors are Hinged at the Front

You’ll more clearly see the Goodwood inspiration inside. Rolls designers helped choose the trim and coloring—they call the leather hue Cornsilk—and the walnut pieces are shaped at Rolls-Royce’s Goodwood facility. A stitched black-leather upper dash looks quirky, but expensive.

Few details were overlooked. A Rolls-like woven headliner has been fitted, as have lamb’s-wool floor mats. The doors and center console are covered in leather. The speedo and tachometer faces have been swapped for versions with Rolls-Royce’s font, although, disappointingly, the tach has not been supplanted by a Rolls power-reserve gauge. Many of the controls get a gloss-black finish, including the steering-wheel spokes. We’d have preferred a thin-rimmed wheel to better match that in a Rolls, but using the chunky Cooper S helm is an understandable concession given the fight provided by the turbocharged Mini’s front wheels.

You can think of the Mini Inspired by Goodwood as the smallest Rolls-Royce available, or the only Roller that comes with a manual. (A six-speed automatic transmission is optional.) Standard equipment will include adaptive Xenon headlights, automatic climate control, a Harman/Kardon sound system, and rear parking sensors. A Cooper S spec’d that way before adding the Rolls bits costs about $30K, and we figure the Inspired car will sticker for at least $45K.

No Ugly Duckling

Blasphemy? Some may think so, but BMW was at least able to keep it in the family, and it avoided building a Rolls-branded microcar à la Aston Martin Cygnet. We’re told some portion of the Mini-Royce allotment will be offered to U.S. customers and we have no doubt they’ll go quickly—possibly to Rolls aspirers or current owners, but most likely to Mini fanatics.

2013 Mini Cooper

2013 Mini Cooper


Mini’s upcoming hardtop isn’t as inappropriately named as is Mountain Dew—seriously, on what mountain does Hi-Liter-colored sugar water condense?—but when the next generation of the hatchback arrives in 2013, it’s going to be rather less mini than it is today.

As we see with this test vehicle, caught by our ace spy photographers, BMW is well into development of the next-gen Mini, which will share its front-wheel-drive platform with the next-generation BMW 1-series. (This is not to be confused with the Europe-only face-lifted 1-series that just dropped; that car remains rear-wheel drive for a few years.) We’re told that the styling already has been finalized—and it was done so under the brand’s previous design director, Gert Hildebrand, who oversaw every modern Mini up until that point. (His replacement, Anders Warming, already is at work penning the cars that will arrive following this one.)

But don’t take everything shown in these pictures too seriously. That apparent small third door? It’s just camo. This is a regular Mini three-door hatchback, not a Clubman replacement. In fact, we feel confident that the regular model’s growth will enable a rear seat large enough to take a next-gen Clubman off the table; the Countryman will continue to serve those customers who insist on a more-practical Mini.

There’s yet more fiction in these spy photos: the BMW 1-series–esque dash. Ask a Mini spokesperson what the brand’s core “values” are, and you’ll hear about—cliché alert—go-kart handling, personalization, and, yes, a central speedo. Those won’t change, and the sober interior present in these spy shots is just a dummy, albeit three-dimensional proof that the Mini and 1-series are set to merge underneath the skin.

With this car-laboration in mind, we expect the next-gen Mini to follow the 1-series in offering a powertrain lineup chock full of small turbocharged engines. In addition to four-cylinders, BMW will add a three-cylinder option to both cars, although it’s unclear whether Americans will be able to opt for an odd number of pistons in their Mini.

Before you go reaching for SSRIs to treat your WhyMustEverySuccessiveGenerationofCarsGrowBiggeritis, keep in mind that part of the reason that the core Mini will grow—in addition to taking a bit more fight to cars like the Volkswagen Golf in Europe—is to make space at the bottom of the range for an actually mini Mini. That vehicle will be conceptually similar to the Rocketman, which recently was approved for production.

The Mini brand may no longer be completely honest in name, but its products are (almost) all fun to cane. We expect the next-gen Mini hatch to be no different. We’re hopeful, at least, that it will taste better than Mountain Dew.

2012 Mini John Cooper Works Coupe

2012 Mini John Cooper Works Coupe


With a car like this,” Rauno Aaltonen says, “sportier is a bad word, because the extreme, if you take it too far, would be wipers on the side screens.”

Aaltonen knows from side-screen wipers. Here we have one of the world’s great rally drivers—an original Flying Finn, a spry 73-year-old former champion who has spent much of his working life on dirt. He is standing at a paved track in Austria, referring to the prototype Mini John Cooper Works coupe we’re here to drive. He is cautioning us against wanting too much.

Good advice, but with the coupe’s looks, much is promised. The Mini JCW coupe—and that’s what we’ll call it, because “Mini John Cooper Works coupe” just sounds all Anglophile Rain Man—is a two-seat, fixed-roof version of the Mini Cooper hatchback. It shares a platform with the current Mini convertible and upcoming Mini roadster, and it’s intended to round out the brand’s lineup in a flashy, attention-getting fashion. It is not—not, insist Mini marketing people—supposed to be the fastest or the most hard-core dog in the litter. Which is kind of confusing, given that it looks the part.

The premise is simple. British tuners like Broadspeed and Universal Power built two-place, Mini-based funsters in the 1960s, so the coupe has historical precedent. To keep costs down, the convertible’s unibody was essentially ported over. The coupe gains steel reinforcements in the sills and trunk but is otherwise a convertible from the beltline down. The windshield angle drops by 13 degrees, and a helmet-like steel roof has been welded over the cockpit, complete with a long trunklid and two spoilers. The rearmost spoiler is active, rising automatically at 50 mph and producing a claimed 88 pounds of downforce.

The rest is details. Driveline choices are unchanged from the rest of the Mini lineup, which is to say, everything from ordinary (122-hp Cooper) to feisty (208-hp John Cooper Works). Europe gets a 143-hp diesel four that Americans will never, ever see. All coupes come standard with a six-speed manual. Cooper and Cooper S buyers can opt for a six-speed automatic. The suspension geometry, the wheelbase, the wheel choices—almost everything else is standard-issue Mini.

Given the ordinary Mini’s chassis talent, that isn’t necessarily a bad thing. The big surprise is weight. The coupe is about 55 pounds porkier than a standard Mini hatch, thanks partly to the chassis reinforcements and active spoiler. (The latter alone adds 12 pounds.) This is a trivial bump, but if you’re giving up a rear seat, you should gain lightness, not lose it. Thanks to the new windshield, height falls by about an inch, to 54.5 inches. A whopping 10 cubic feet of cargo can fit underneath the trunklid, more if you take advantage of the standard pass-through between the two seats.

From the cockpit, the coupe doesn’t seem that different. The low roofline is annoying only when you look out the side windows and feel like Dumb Donald from the Fat Albert series, eyes up under your hat. The standard, cave-like black headliner and the dinky glass area keep the rearview mirror from telling you much. All the familiar brand cues are present, including the dash-mounted toggle switches and that ridiculous pizza-sized central speedometer.

Surprisingly, the coupe’s charms lie at speed. Our Austrian seat time was limited to John Cooper Works models, only on a smooth track, and only in the dry. In that idyllic environment, everything worked. The John Cooper Works four is a torquey symphony of farts, fizzes, and pops, a candy-coated gem of an engine. The cockpit isn’t too noisy, and wind noise isn’t excessive. With stability control on, this coupe reminds you of other Minis—talkative steering, taut body motions, progressive brake and clutch feel.

Turn off the stability control, however, and all hell breaks loose. Freed from the bonds of computer-managed balance, the JCW giddily backs itself into corners, chucking its ass out at the slightest rough turn-in or throttle lift. Inside wheelspin is everywhere, understeer only present if you abuse the gas with too much steering cranked in. It’s wonderful. This is what you thought front-drive cars were like when you were five years old: small, manic, and desperately in need of, to quote Aaltonen, side-screen wipers. And it’s one step crazier than the rest of the Mini lineup.

Wait, what?

When pressed, Mini staff admit that the coupe’s suspension tuning might differ from that of the hatch. They are not overly forthcoming on this point, only hinting that the damping is a bit stiffer and that the base Cooper coupe wears the 18-mm rear anti-roll bar from a Cooper S hatchback. “With the coupe,” says Mini engineer Heinz Krusche, “we tried to overcome the additional weight, to make the car as agile as the hatch. But at the moment”—he hesitates, as if unsure whether or not to continue—“it looks like we are perhaps a little bit more agile.”

We asked if the car would be detuned for production, maybe for the sake of ride quality and to match the tamer handling of its brethren. No answer. It’s all wonderfully suspicious, as if the boys in engineering were trying to pull a fast one on the rest of the company. If so, bully for them. A car that looks like this should drive this nutty.

About that: Buy a Mini coupe, people are going to gawp. The styling is divisive—this is an in-your-face, impractical version of an otherwise sensible machine, and it’s rife with contradiction. It’s targeted at masculine buyers but looks about as butch as a pink summer hat. It may or may not end up feeling sportier than its siblings. And although it’d be nice if the prototype’s giddy handling sees the showroom, that might not be appreciated by those who buy the car for its looks.

Our hosts in Austria didn’t seem bothered by this, but perhaps that’s intentional. As on most prototype drives, we weren’t given a lot of straight answers. Except from Aaltonen. He likes it sideways. Go figure.

2014 Mini Cooper Hybrid

2014 Mini Cooper Hybrid


Due in about three years, the next-generation Mini Cooper will offer a four-wheel-drive version. There’s a catch, though: The rear wheels will have no connection to the engine. The car will be a hybrid, and the rear wheels will exclusively be turned by an electric motor.

As BMW switches the next-generation 1-series to front-wheel drive, and expands the Mini portfolio with several new models, the Bavarians are looking at options for hybridizing its upcoming front-wheel drivers. To expedite the process, BMW recently announced a partnership with PSA Peugeot Citroën to develop hybrid tech for front-drive applications. Although BMW presently offers hybrid versions of its X6 and 7-series, each uses a rear-wheel-drive-oriented system co-developed with other companies—and neither is especially frugal. PSA, on the other hand, is launching the Peugeot 3008 Hybrid 4 this year, a compact MPV on a front-wheel-drive platform with a rear-mounted electric motor powering the rear wheels. BMW seems to see its smaller cars heading in this direction.

In this test mule, we can see that the electric motor is connected to the rear axle. The extra power and enhanced launchability should give it a decisive advantage over front-drive Minis, and while the motor and battery pack will add unwelcome weight, at least they’ll be mounted low in the chassis. That said, the production cars won’t be quite as low to the ground as the mule seen here. The hybrid module will likely be offered in a number of Mini derivatives; from the “regular” Mini Cooper up to the Countryman.

It’s not yet clear what kind of combustion engine Mini will pair with the electric drive system, although both diesel and gasoline mills would be compatible. The hybrid won’t share much technology with the Mini E, and we are optimistic that—unlike in that fully electric Mini—rear seating will be part of the package.

Like the original Mini, today’s Cooper is most at home in cities, and it’s in the slow, stop-and-go traffic that hybrid systems best deliver their benefits. The Mini remains hot for fashionable urban drivers, and it’s possible that a hybrid version will up the chic factor for these shoppers—even if it is very late to the eco-party.

How will the hybrid versions be positioned in the Mini lineup? Peugeot priced the 3008 hybrid at the very top of the car’s price ladder. With more power and all-wheel drive, the hybrid Minis are likely to be the most expensive in their ranges, too. It also remains to be seen how much the extra weight and complexity will diminish the Mini models’ playful character.