Monday, June 13, 2011

Mazda Taiki Concept

Mazda Taiki Concept

Ever seen a car styled like a celestial maiden's robes? Mazda says that's the design inspiration for the Mazda Taiki, a rear-wheel-drive sports-car concept that will debut at the Tokyo auto show in October.

Like the Nagare, Ryuga, and Hakaze concepts before it, the Taiki has a flowing, aerodynamic form that follows Mazda's new "flow" styling concept.

In Japanese, taiki means atmosphere, a fitting name for the light, aerodynamic body. The concept is part of the "Sustainable Zoom-Zoom" theme Mazda plans to emphasize in Tokyo.

The skirted rear wheels are outset from the body, and an all-glass canopy wraps around the driver and passenger. The stretched two-seater's interior continues the flowing design theme.

Power for the Taiki will come from a new version of the Renesis rotary engine used in the RX-8 sports car. Mazda engineers say they have bumped displacement up to 1.6 liters (from 1.3 liters) and used direct-injection to increase torque output across the power band. This should allow them to create an even sportier car that is a little easier on the environment.

2012 Mazda 3 - Mazdaspeed 3

2012 Mazda 3 - Mazdaspeed 3

Mazda is using the New York auto show to formally introduce a raft of mid-cycle changes for its Mazda 3 sedan and five-door hatchback. We received a few initial details in February, but here now is the full scoop on the mechanical and stylistic changes.

SKY’s the Limit

While the current 2.0- and 2.5-liter MZR inline-fours—as well as the Mazdaspeed 3’s 2.3-liter turbo-four—continue on and remain unchanged for 2012, the big news is the addition of the new SKYACTIV-G 2.0-liter four. Available in both sedan and hatch, the SKYACTIV-G offers 155 hp at 6000 rpm and 148 lb-ft of torque at 4100 rpm, slight boosts over the MZR 2.0 (148 hp, 135 lb-ft). The new mill also achieves improved fuel economy courtesy of its rather lofty 12.0:1 compression ratio, new multi-hole fuel injectors, revised pistons, and dual sequential valve timing that Mazda says also helps reduce pumping losses.

Backing up the new engine are two SKY-themed gearboxes. The SKYACTIV-MT six-speed manual is slightly lighter than the standard six-speed and employs a shorter-throw shifter for a crisper feel. The optional SKYACTIV-Drive six-speed automatic sports a more aggressive lock-up clutch in its torque converter for improved efficiency. (Non-SKY models carry over with five-speed automatics and manuals, save 2.5 models, which get a six-speed manual.) Paired with the new automatic, SKYACTIV sedans are projected to achieve EPA ratings of 28 mpg in the city and 40 mpg on the highway, with five-doors at 28/38. That’s up from 24/33 for a 2011 sedan equipped with the 2.0 and five-speed automatic and 22/29 for an automatic five-door with the 2.5.

Sticking with the SKYACTIV-MT lowers the 2012 sedan’s figures to 27 city/39 highway, but that’s still a nice bump from 25/33 for a 2011 model with the 2.0 and five-speed manual. Hatchbacks will be rated at 27 city/38 highway, improving on the 2.5/six-speed-manual combo’s 20/28.

Additional nuts-and-bolts changes for 2012 include the adoption of electro-hydraulic power steering and retuned dampers all around, which Mazda says will give the fun-loving 3 a lighter, more nimble feel at low speeds and more feedback in the corners. Additional spot welds in the suspension crossmembers reinforce the body structure, as does the replacement of two braces under the floor with a single, stronger structure in SKYACTIV-G 2.0-liter and 2.5-equipped models.

Still Smiling

Part of the 2012 Mazda 3’s improved efficiency also comes from slipperier, slightly more refined styling—although the smiley face is still here. Although not a dramatic makeover, the revised front fascia is more sculpted than before, the fog lights are now rounded, and the underbody has been tweaked for less drag. There are new 16- and 17-inch wheel designs, too. Those opting for the SKY powertrain will see their 3s fitted with a new, blue-accented engine cover, blue rings around the headlight lenses, and SKYACTIV badging on the rump.

Changes to the interior are minor and are limited to black plastic in the instrument panel and a silver finish on the climate-control dials and audio head unit. Oh, and there’s white text in the information displays in place of last year’s red fonts. The 2012 Mazdaspeed 3 largely carries over, adopting similar styling revisions plus a new leather-wrapped shifter and parking-brake handle.

With a slight tick upward in output and lofty fuel-economy numbers, it seems buyers of the Mazda 3 will be able to have their sake and drink it, too. Well, so long as they shoot for the SKY.

2012 Mazda 3 to Get Face Lift, 163-hp SKYACTIV Engine

2012 Mazda 3 to Get Face Lift, 163-hp SKYACTIV Engine

Mazda has announced that the first recipient of its new SKYACTIV four-cylinder engine will be the face-lifted 2012 Mazda 3, set to debut at the New York auto show in April. The exterior styling has been tweaked, but the real story is, of course, the engine.

Although the company hasn’t yet released specs on the SKYACTIV engine as it will appear in the 3, we know quite a bit about it from our drive of several prototypes equipped with the mill last August. You can read all the details here, but here’s the recap: The iteration we’re likely to see in the Mazda 3 is a 2.0-liter four-cylinder, which was good for 163 hp and 155 lb-ft during development. When it’s burning regular 87-octane gasoline, though, torque decreases by about five percent. For reference, the current 2.0-liter in the 3 makes 148 hp and 135 lb-ft, while the optional 2.5-liter four produces 167 hp and 168 lb-ft.

The engine will pair with Mazda’s new SKYACTIV six-speed automatic transmission, which features an aggressive lock-up clutch for the torque converter. This, combined with the efficient engine, has Mazda hoping for an EPA rating of 30 mpg city/40 highway for the 2012 3—that’s up from bests of 25/33 and 22/29, respectively, for the current 2.0 and 2.5. Stick lovers can rest easy, as the engine will also be available with the company’s slick six-speed manual—although the company isn’t yet revealing the fuel economy for that combo.

The SKYACTIV engine and transmission will eventually be installed in the next-gen Mazda 6, it makes sense for the company to install it first in a small car, where it can reap the PR benefits of the magical 40-mpg figure. We’ll have more updated specs on the 2012 Mazda 3 as we approach its official unveil in April.

Mazda Kiyora Concept - 2011 Mazda 1

Mazda Kiyora Concept - 2011 Mazda 1

Mazda will show a city-car concept, the Kiyora, as a prelude to putting a tiny A-segment car in the marketplace in most parts of the world.

Mazda nomenclature suggests it would go into production as the Mazda 1, and there are no expectations it will make it to North America. The Japanese automaker has been reluctant to introduce the larger Mazda 2 here, despite a trend to smaller, more gas-miserly vehicles.

The Kiyora, which will make its global debut at the 2008 Paris auto show, is described as a lightweight, next-generation urban compact concept. It would enter the fray against the likes of the Volkswagen Up! family and the Toyota iQ. In most parts of the world, a battle is heating up in the city-car segment, and it appears Mazda wants to use wild styling to make its mark.

The concept, designed in Europe, will be shown with a direct-injection four-cylinder engine with a stop-start system to further improve fuel economy. While start-stop systems are still relatively rare in North America, they are becoming de rigueur on small vehicles in Europe.

The Kiyora (which means clean and pure in Japanese) follows a long line of flowing and sometimes whimsical concepts from Mazda. This latest version hones the aerodynamic shape of the Nagare and adds an interior designed to appeal to young buyers. When the concept makes it to reality, it will be based on a new small-car platform (some say an offshoot of the Mazda 2 architecture) designed to be more lightweight than past vehicles.

Mazda will also use Paris to show the facelift planned for the MX-5, as well as a version of the Mazda 2 with a 1.6-liter diesel engine. A Mazda 6 with a 2.2-liter turbo-diesel for Europe will also make its debut.

2018 Mazda 3 Concept

2018 Mazda 3 Concept

What if you could design your own car from scratch and then have a major carmaker bring it to life? It's a wannabe designer's dream—and one the folks at the Zoom-Zoom factory have made possible this year with the Mazda Design Challenge. In partnership with the online social networking giant Facebook, Mazda gave contestants the chance to submit their vision of the 2018 Mazda 3 by way of a 150-word description and optional illustration.

After much deliberation by Mazda engineers and Facebook members alike, it was Mallory McMorrow of South Bend, Indiana, who emerged as the winner. Soon after the victory, Mallory was paired with top Mazda designer Jacques Flynn, who helped make her ideas a reality in the sketch you see here. Bearing much resemblance to the Mazda Ryuga concept that debuted in Detroit earlier this year, McMorrow's 2018 Mazda 3 combines current Mazda styling cues with elements from concepts that have bowed this year on the auto show circuit. McMorrow describes her vision as a combination of sports-car qualities and everyday practicality, something Mazda is definitely familiar with. "I was thrilled when I opened up the images of the final renderings. I'm proud to say that the end design was still definitely my car, and I can't wait to see it come to fruition on the show floor," McMorrow said.

That's right, she said the show floor. Mazda has taken this competition a step further, authorizing a full-size prototype of the concept to be carved from a lump of clay live at November's L.A. auto show. Over the course of 10 days, McMorrow will be paired with Franz von Holzhausen, director of design for Mazda North America, and his team to bring the design to life. So for all you auto show junkies, bring some popcorn and a lawn chair and watch them chisel away from noon to 8 p.m. daily until the final sculpture is unveiled at 3 p.m. on Nov. 24. We'll let you know if and when the 2018 Mazda 3 is headed for sheetmetal.

2012 Mazda 5 Sport Manual

2012 Mazda 5 Sport Manual

The stick-shifted Mazda 5 tested here isn’t dripping in evil black paint, it’s not especially powerful, and it doesn’t turn asphalt into pudding with its tremendous power. We still feel justified in calling it Lord Vader’s van, though, as long as we’re speaking Dutch, in which vader simply means “father.” What we mean is that the Mazda 5 with a six-speed manual transmission is the ultimate dad van.

More Power, More Ratios, More Refinement

A manual transmission goes a long way to ease the sting of what is, simply put, a dorky family vehicle. But dorks and nondorks alike will find much to appreciate about the 5. Although the 2.5-liter four’s 157 hp and 163 lb-ft are something to brag about only to friends who are still piddling around in Lancia Appias, when paired with the six-speed manual transmission, they proved enough for an 8.3-second run to 60 mph. That’s a significant improvement of 0.7 second over the time we got with an autobox-equipped 5.

Pulling off that 8.3-second sprint required an abusive launch that netted a bit of torque steer (surprising from a vehicle with only 163 lb-ft) and an immoderate amount of wheelspin. In driving with fewer clutch dumps, however, takeoffs are a breeze, although we did wish for more feel through the left pedal. Like the clutches in our recently departed long-term Mazda 3 and, to a lesser extent, our Mazda 2, the takeup in the 5 is vague and numb, making it too easy to overrev the engine. On the plus side, the shifter’s action is slicker than 1954, and we appreciated the addition of a sixth cog to the gearbox. Although the last-gen Mazda 5 offered a row-your-own transmission, it was limited to five forward ratios.

There’s more to recommend the 5’s driving experience. The suspension is compliant and comfortable, the smooth ride more reminiscent of the 6 sedan’s than that of the occasionally stiff 3 with which the 5 shares its underpinnings. The steering is precise—it certainly is more direct and provides more feel than you’d find in most small three-row crossovers or in a bigger van—and the 5 feels remarkably neutral, despite an unimpressive 0.78 g on our skidpad. Make no mistake, the 5 is bested by the 3 for smiles per mile, but it is way more gratifying than something with sliding doors has a right to be.

On the road, our enthusiasm for a mini-minivan with a stick resulted in zealous use of the gas pedal, which held our observed fuel economy to 22 mpg. That’s at the bottom of the 21 mpg city/28 highway EPA estimates for the 5 and one fewer mpg than we saw with the automatic-equipped 5.

A Van for Minimalists

As minivans transitioned from 1980s suburban zeitgeist to four-wheeled punch lines, everyone—even manufacturers—realized there’s nothing sexy about a box. So vans have been designed for the past decade to sell based on reason: Successful sellers like the Honda Odyssey and Chrysler/Dodge twins are gargantuan caverns. They reward spelunking families with flipping, folding, sliding seats, Big Brother’s telescreens, and cubbies galore. But the Mazda 5 eschews the kitchen-sink philosophy, instead offering a smaller package with fewer gadgets.

A third row of seats is present, but it’s for in-a-pinch accommodations only. Legroom is nonexistent in the way back, the bottom cushion is mounted on the floor, and the headrest comprises most of the backrest as well. For the love of good joint health, put no one but your neighbor’s kids back there. Similarly, upfront storage bins are limited, and the two second-row passengers have to make do with a small console. That’s not to say the 5 feels like a stripped-out vehicle, but those expecting a plethora of bins in which to ditch empty Capri Sun pouches will be disappointed.

Because few folks actually buy Mazda 5s with manual transmissions, the company limits the stick’s availability to the entry-level Sport trim. This means the seats are cloth and the steering wheel is rubbery plastic. Also conspicuously absent from the options sheet are a sunroof, Bluetooth connectivity, iPod integration, a USB jack, a trip computer, and xenon headlights. As a result of the slim features list and short menu of extras, the entry-level 5 is actually cheaper than the least-expensive five-door Mazda 3. To its $19,990 base price, the van we tested featured a stunning $50 rear bumper guard, making it a steal at $20,040.

To get into a full-size van like the Dodge Grand Caravan, shoppers have to pony up another $5000 or so. For the money, they get more space, much more power, and more features. But you won’t find one thing on the options list for any other sliding-door vehicle in the U.S.—the 5’s manual transmission. Dads, rejoice.

2012 Mazda 5 Grand Touring

2012 Mazda 5 Grand Touring

Don’t be alarmed if you’re not too familiar with the Mazda 5. After all, Mazda sold only about 16,000 in 2010. Chrysler sold as many Town & Country minivans every two months last year, but Mazda’s is still an impressive feat, considering that the 5 has almost zero marketing support.

So let us reintroduce the Mazda 5, which has been updated for the 2012 model year with new sheetmetal, a new engine, and a new dash. For those buyers enlightened enough to spec a manual transmission in their tiny van—about five percent of U.S. 5 adopters—the 5’s five-speed is replaced by a six-speed for 2012. Unfortunately, the van tested here was equipped with an automatic. Mazda says this mini-minivan is aimed at young families looking to move up from an economy car but who don’t want the high sticker price or sluggish handling of a bigger van. Given that narrow niche, the 5 would probably sell in small numbers even if it did receive marketing support. The fully loaded Grand Touring model we tested—sunroof, automatic xenon headlights, heated power mirrors, Sirius satellite radio, leather seats (heated in front)—comes in under the magic $25,000 limbo stick, at $24,670.

No Hiding the Stowaway

But wait, isn’t this the same pitch Ford gives for the upcoming C-Max? Both vehicles can trace their underpinnings back to the same Ford global C-platform, but neither company admits to much collusion. They’re clearly different vehicles, as evidenced by the Mazda’s second-row center console that folds into the right-side seat bottom. In the C-Max, it’s the middle seat that folds in exactly the same way. Suspiciously similar stowage aside, the vans at least look nothing alike. The 5 gets new front styling with a smiley-face grille, like those on the Mazda 2 and 3. Its sides now feature the “sand ripple” creases first seen on the Nagare concept car. In the back, horizontal taillights replace the vertical stalks of the old 5.

Inside, the same three-row, six-passenger seating configuration remains. Noticeably absent is the option for navigation, as Mazda says its customers would rather buy a $100 portable nav unit than suffer the higher price of a factory piece. We’re still a bit skeptical of this plan when the big players in the small-car field are offering more luxury and features than the segment has ever seen before. On the C-Max, for example, Ford plans to offer everything but the kitchen sink—Ford Sync will be available, though—including power side doors and a power hatch. We do expect, however, that such options would push the C-Max’s sticker well above the 5’s maximum. A C-Max equipped like the 5 tested here should price out similarly.

Four-Cylinder 5

Under the hood, the Mazda 5 freshens up with a 2.5-liter inline-four similar to that in the 3, 6, and CX-7. Compared with the outgoing 2.3-liter, the 2.5 has 4 more hp—157—at a power peak 500 rpm earlier, at 6000. Torque increases 15 lb-ft to 163 and also tops out 500 rpm lower, at 4000. Highway fuel economy inches up 1 mpg to 28, although our as-tested result of 23 is closer to the 21-mpg city figure. On the test track, the new vanlet runs from 0 to 60 mph in nine seconds flat and covers the quarter-mile in 17.1 at 82 mph. It’s far from blistering but is 0.4 second quicker to 60 than before.

The Mazda 5 handles better than the meager steady-state cornering figure of 0.81 g would suggest. Turn the steering wheel, and the front tires change path without delay. All the controls and responses are in harmony, making it easy (and fun) to wring the most out of the Mazda 5. When was the last time you wanted to wring anything but your own neck in a minivan?

A Mazda 5 with a manual would be quicker, of course, and less expensive, too—the manual is only available in the $19,990 Sport model. More important, its mere availability is a reminder that Mazda is one of the few brands that continue to cater to people who care about driving. That mind-set is evident even in the slushbox-equipped 5 that we tested. Most of the fun of the Mazda 3 is here, only with about 500 extra pounds. So, although the Mazda 5 isn’t the Miata of minivans—nothing really is—it is a reminder that family hauling doesn’t mean you have to give up on fun driving.

Mazdaspeed 5 - Project Car

Mazdaspeed 5 - Project Car

Sometimes conversations in our office can get bizarre. Take the subject at hand, a hot-rod minivan. Maybe it was a slow news day, but the topic came up because the Mazda 5 is an appealing small van—a minivan in the purest sense—and more fun to drive than pretty much anything else with sliding side doors.

However, driving excitement is hard to appreciate when it’s tempered by an anemic power-to-weight ratio. Even though the Mazda 5 weighs 3358 pounds—that’s pretty mini as far as vans go—its 153-hp, 2.3-liter four doesn’t produce acceleration blisters when asked to propel that much mass.

With that thought in mind, the conversation started getting surreal. And before you could say, “You guys are smoking banana peels,” we were thinking of ways to add some real hustle to the little Mazda’s repertoire. Imagine, we mused, the astonished faces when such an innocent-looking mommymobile lights up its front tires and disappears in a cloud of smoke!

Even more appealing, the solution seemed simple. Since the 5 shares its underpinnings with the 3, we could just acquire a turbocharged Mazdaspeed 3 powertrain and swap it for the stock unit, which would instantly add 110 horsepower. Nothing to it. Guys swap out engines at racetracks in a matter of a couple hours. The result, a one-of-a-kind “Mazdaspeed 5,” would be perhaps the coolest project car yet in our Boss Wagon series [see Boss Wagon History]. And we figured we could do it ourselves.

2012 Ford C-Max - F Drive

2012 Ford C-Max - F Drive

Put aside your mom-mobile prejudices for a moment, and take a look at Ford’s latest attempt at a minivan, the C-Max. Coming here in early 2012, our C-Max is called the Grand C-Max in Europe; over there, the plain C-Max name is applied to a shorter, five-seat version, which we won’t be getting. Both share underpinnings with the 2012 Focus, but the wheelbase of the Grand is stretched by 5.5 inches, to 109.8.

If you’ve already looked at the pictures, you’ve noticed that the C-Max has two sliding doors. By most popular definitions, this makes it a minivan, the lamest of automotive descriptors. Ford, however, is not worried that the C-Max will be uncool. Jim Farley, Ford’s V-P of global marketing, service, and sales, believes the Millennial Generation will make different choices than did its parents. The SUV boom was fueled in part by an aversion to boxy minivans. But the kids that grew up in those SUVs never grew to loathe the minivan as the generation before them did. Thus, the C-Max target buyer sees sliding doors as a convenience—at least that’s what Ford hopes. Whatever customers ultimately decide, the C-Max differs from modern minivans in a few ways. For starters, it’s smaller, more the size of the Mazda 5 than the Honda Odyssey. At 178.0 inches long, the C-Max is two feet shorter than the Honda and 3.5 inches shorter than the Mazda. The C-Max has a wagonlike two-box silhouette instead of the monobox-on-wheels look of modern minivans.

Three Rows, but Only Two Full-Size

The C-Max officially holds seven passengers, but the seating configuration is best described as five-plus-two. The two most rearward seats lack headroom for adults—although they would be adequate for short trips—but smaller children should fit fine. Keeping the third row folded keeps cargo capacity reasonable, as the van accommodates 25 cubic feet behind the second row; only three cubic feet remain in seven-passenger mode. Fold every seat, and a magnetic cover flops over the stowed seatbacks to create a flat load floor and deliver 60 cubes of storage.

For those who need all three rows, the sliding second row is home to the C-Max’s best trick, whereby the center seat can be stored under its passenger-side neighbor. You simply slide the middle perch forward (the second-row bench is split 40/20/40), pop up the outboard seat’s bottom cushion, and flip the middle seat into place. This allows access to the third row without folding the second forward; child seats can then be left installed in the middle row without losing the versatility of the rearmost seats.

The interior materials in the top-of-the-line Platinum trim level we drove on our preview were excellent, with high-quality plastics and a pleasing amount of aluminum-look trim. The instrument panel is nearly identical to that of the upcoming Focus, which means it packs more character and excitement in its dashboard than most minivans do in their entirety.

EcoBoost, Of Course

As mentioned above, the C-Max won’t be coming to the United States until early 2012. With the final North American product so far out, there are some details Ford has yet to reveal. The company tells us the U.S.-market C-Max will be powered by a 1.6-liter EcoBoost turbocharged four making 148 hp and 177 lb-ft (199 lb-ft with a Porsche-like temporary-overboost function); other engine options haven’t been confirmed, including the possibility of a 2.0-liter EcoBoost. European models get a higher-output, 177-hp version of the EcoBoost, as well as two diesel engines and a naturally aspirated 1.6-liter pulled from the Fiesta. It is unlikely that the naturally aspirated engine will be offered here, and the diesels would probably be too expensive. Ford is strangely quiet on the topic of transmissions, other than saying there won’t be a manual for our market. We’ll get a six-speed automatic, but Ford won’t say whether that transmission is a version of its dual-clutch PowerShift or a conventional autobox. Based on our experience with the PowerShift in the Fiesta, either option will give the same basic driving experience—smooth, but slow to change gears.

Our preview gave no opportunity to drive the C-Max exactly as it will appear here, although we were able to cobble together an impression from the two vehicles available to us: a Grand C-Max (our C-Max) fitted with a diesel engine and the dual-clutch gearbox, and the smaller, Euro C-Max with the EcoBoost engine. The EcoBoost offers good low-end torque and minimal turbo lag. We expect the larger van bound for our shores to turn in a 0-to-60-mph time just below 10 seconds. Handling is good, albeit with the “for a tall wagon” disclaimer, but anyone used to driving small SUVs or larger minivans will be impressed with the carlike characteristics. When our C-Max goes on sale, the summer tires we sampled will be swapped for all-seasons, but the ride and handling targets are the same. We’ve heard that story before, and in the end, the Fiesta didn’t turn out quite as lively as its European twin. But the C-Max should fare better, if only because our expectation of driving thrills in a people mover is pretty low.

How about fuel efficiency and cost? Ford’s focus group (no pun intended) said it would be really happy with 30 mpg highway. That would top the automatic Mazda 5’s by 3 mpg. As for price, the Mazda starts just above $20,000 with an automatic and tops out at nearly $30,000. Ford representatives said the C-Max will come well equipped for $25,000. It remains to be seen how much of the C-Max’s potential is realized when it arrives stateside. But it’s safe to say we haven’t been looking forward to a minivan this much in a long time.

2012 Ford C-Max

2012 Ford C-Max

Ford product chief Derrick Kuzak calls it a “white-space vehicle exploring the crossover between car and minivan.” We call it Europe’s Grand C-Max with a shorter name. (Ford sells both a C-Max and a Grand C-Max in Europe, but the Continent’s C-Max is smaller and only has two rows of seats.) No matter which descriptor you prefer, the people-moving C-Max is on its way here for 2012.

We have already driven the three-row Grand C-Max in Europe and liked what we experienced—basically a mini-minivan with some clever packaging—but the cars we drove didn’t have the American powertrains installed, perhaps because details of the U.S. engine lineup had not yet been ironed out.

Two Fours and 5+2

Now we know that the base engine is a 2.5-liter four-cylinder making 168 hp and 167 lb-ft of torque. The optional engine is a 1.6-liter EcoBoost (that means it’s turbocharged and direct-injected, for those who haven’t received the message) four that puts out the same horsepower as the 2.5 on regular gas, but cranks it up to 180 hp on premium; torque using either fuel is 173 lb-ft. Ford promises better fuel economy for the more expensive and sometimes-more-powerful EcoBoost four, thereby justifying its higher cost. (A similar scheme is planned for the all-new Explorer.) No matter which powerplant is fitted, a six-speed automatic transmission is the only choice.

The interior has the same “5+2” seating as Europe’s Grand C-Max. The second row’s middle seat can be folded and stowed inside the seat to its right, creating an aisle for easy access to two small seats in the third row. Buyers will be able to choose a third-row-delete option for 5+0 seating. Sync and MyFord Touch will be available, as will a rearview camera, active park assist, and Curve Control, an evolution of stability control first seen on the new Explorer.

Look, Moms, No Hands!

The Americanized C-Max has one unique party trick: a hands-free liftgate release. Like the hop-on-one-leg trunk popper on the latest European VW Passat, the C-Max’s system uses sensors mounted on the rear bumper that detect when your leg and foot (or anything, really) are waved past, and pops the hatch. The proximity key has to be nearby, so don’t expect free access to C-Max cargo holds or fear for the safety of your groceries when a pack of feral dogs rampages through your neighborhood. The idea is that, when your hands are full of packages/kids/laziness, a leg wave is easier than fumbling for your keys. We wouldn’t be surprised if makers of full-size minivans adopt this technology soon.

Ford says the C-Max is designed for “growing, busy North American families.” The same phrase describes Ford’s C-segment platform: The company promises 10 new vehicles based on this architecture—which is shared with the new Focus—by 2012. The U.S.-spec C-Max will be shown first at January’s 2011 Detroit auto show, with the car going on sale in early 2012.

2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid and C-Max Energi Plug-In Hybrid

2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid and C-Max Energi Plug-In Hybrid

Can’t decide between an EV, a regular hybrid, or a plug-in hybrid? Come 2012, you won’t have to make that decision until after arriving at a Ford dealership. Following the recently unveiled Focus Electric, Ford is announcing the C-Max hybrid and C-Max Energi plug-in hybrid at the 2011 Detroit auto show.

Although the gas-powered C-Max is not on sale here yet, Ford is already filling out the lineup with alternative-energy versions. The plan is to offer a Neapolitan-like array of electrified vehicles to satisfy every possible customer—every customer who wants an electrified vehicle, that is. While the pair of hybrids will be very similar, there are of course some differences to note, namely the Energi’s fender-mounted charge port and accompanying ability to pull a charge from the grid.

C-Max Hybrid

The hybridized C-Max will use a powertrain similar to that in the Ford Fusion and Lincoln MKZ hybrids. No details have been supplied, but we expect an Atkinson-cycle four-cylinder coupled to a hybrid motor and electronics similar to what’s used in the aforementioned sedans. Ford says the C-Max hybrid will have better fuel-economy ratings than those cars’ 41-mpg city number. The C-Max will also be able to reach higher speeds in EV mode than the Fusion and MKZ’s 47 mph.

C-Max Energi

The Energi—gee, that’s an awkward spelling—will use a modified version of that system. Ford claims an overnight battery fill-up will be possible on 120-volt power, but the company isn’t saying yet how far the vehicle will travel on electrons alone—or much else about it. When the vehicle is started, it will operate as an EV until the battery hits a level that requires charging from the onboard Atkinson-cycle engine.

For charging, the charge port has the same four-quadrant lighting scheme as the Focus Electric, wherein a ring surrounding the plug lights up in stages to signify how completely the batteries are charged. Energi owners also will have access to MyFord Mobile; this mobile app allows remote access to the car for things like charge scheduling, checking the battery level, and optimizing the cabin and battery temperatures before unplugging.

Batteries Make the Difference

While both C-Max hybrids rely on lithium-ion batteries, the batteries themselves will differ as a result of their operational demands. The Energi model uses a battery designed for recharging and prolonged discharge when in all-electric mode, whereas the normal hybrid uses a battery intended for shorter bursts of juice. Other differences include the Energi’s associated charger and wiring, and a temperature-control circuit for its battery; the normal hybrid’s battery is air-cooled like those in Ford’s other hybrids.

Chocolate, strawberry, or vanilla? That choice will be yours when the C-Max hybrid and C-Max Energi join the standard, gas-only C-Max in 2012.

Toyota Joins with Tech Company

Toyota Joins with Tech Company WiTricity To Develop Wireless Charging

WiTricity has not an iota to do with Kennewick, Pasco, and Richland, Washington. Nor is it the county-fair touring incarnation of Quad City DJs, formed after they failed to follow up “C’Mon N’ Ride It (The Train)” with another smash hit. Rather, the Massachusetts company is following up on Nikola Tesla’s promise of supplying electricity via thin air. Using magnetic fields to carry juice, WiTricity claims their technology is scalable from milliwatts (for say, a wireless mouse) to kilowatts (appropriate for, oh, you know, EVs.)

WiTricity has already done work for several automakers and suppliers, partnering recently with Delphi for a wireless charging system that the latter displayed at the SAE World Congress this past month. Now, WiTricity and Toyota have announced that they’ll be working together as well, collaborating on developing wireless charging systems. Aside from the gee-whiz factor for salesmen—“…And you never have to plug it in!” tech like WiTricity’s carries implications for wider charging infrastructure in public spaces. Buff the mind’s eyeball with a virtual third rail. Imagine life-size, virtual Scalectrix.

While we doubt the system will be ready to hit the market in time for the upcoming plug-in-electric Prius—which, perhaps, would need to be called the park-over-the-mat-electric Prius—we imagine that once wireless charging hits the EV scene, nobody will reminisce fondly about the days of plugging your electric car into an extension cord.

2012 Toyota Prius MPV

2012 Toyota Prius MPV

We’re the first to get up and get down when we hear that someone’s raising the roof. But we’re curbing our enthusiasm a bit in the case of the Toyota Prius MPV, which our spies just nabbed testing here on American roads. The words “Prius minivan” don’t exactly get our blood boiling.

From the looks of things, the Prius MPV/crossover/mini-minivan thing will look exactly like, well, a Prius with a flatter, higher roof and an upright rear window. It appears to be sized somewhere between a Toyota Matrix and a Mazda 5, and to feature forward-hinged rear doors. Through the camouflage, it’s easy to see Prius-esque graphics on the front end and in the taillamps, as well as the Prius’s characteristic triangular D-pillar. The wheels are remarkably large for a Prius (the base sedan rides on puny 15-inchers); the rollers here are either 18s or really big–looking 17s. Inside, the MPV features center-mounted gauges like those in the regular Prius. Maximum seating capacity is unknown as of now, but squeezing in a third row, as Kia did on its diminutive Rondo, is a possibility.

Beneath the skin, expect to see the next generation of Toyota’s Hybrid Synergy Drive, although not necessarily one using pricey lithium-ion battery technology; the company has pledged to stick with nickel-metal hydride batteries for a long time to come. (As demand for plug-in hybrids increases, however, we expect Toyota could release a Prius MPV variant with the lithium-ion-powered setup from the plug-in Prius, which is due for the 2012 model year.) The MPV may, however, get a larger four-cylinder engine displacing 2.5 liters or so. Just how high Toyota can stretch this vehicle’s fuel economy remains to be seen, but hitting the sedan’s vaunted 50-mpg EPA combined mileage mark will be tough, given the MPV’s presumed weight gain, its taller profile, and the internal-combustion engine’s potential displacement increase.

We’re not terribly shocked to see this new body style emerge; it’s been an open secret that the Prius family would grow, even as the company has yet to officially confirm as much. Last year, Toyota told us that it is planning to launch no fewer than 10 new hybrids by 2012, and that an MPV was the vehicle most requested by current Prius owners. How much this version would cost relative to the current five-door is TBD, of course, but a starting point of around $25K wouldn’t be surprising.

2012 Toyota Prius V Hybrid

2012 Toyota Prius V Hybrid

Since 1997, more than two million Toyota Prius hybrids have been sold in 70 countries. Loosely translated, the Latin word prius means “ahead of the curve,” not “creep along in the passing lane” as some owners seem to believe. The U.S. is the single largest Prius market with more than a million purchased here since 2000. The Prius currently outsells 30 other U.S.-market hybrids combined.

Refuting early powertrain-complexity and battery-life scares, more than 97 percent of the Priuses produced are still on the road. Used battery packs are available from salvage yards for around $500.

Born a compact fuel-squeezer and penny-pincher, Prius advanced to the mid-size class in 2003. That second-generation model earned wide acclaim, including a spot on our 2004 10Best list.

Toyota’s U.S. general manager, Bob Carter, has high hopes that a growing Prius family will eventually surpass the sales volumes of the Camry and Corolla cash cows. And here is the first of the basic hatchback’s descendants, the Prius V. (That’s pronounced “vee” and not “five.”)

The V badge distinguishing the second Prius arriving this fall supposedly is meant to imply “versatile,” but it might just as well be Toyota’s victory salute. A risky engineering experiment worked, the Prius badge is universally recognized as the king of gas-electrics, and the hybrid pixie dust is being sprinkled over the 2012 V and two additional Prius models arriving next year.

Instead of simply flattening the roof and enlarging the standard Prius’s hatch to create the V, Toyota engineers went the extra mile. Their all-new body fits between conventional wagons, minivans, and compact crossovers. Size-wise, it’s a Mazda 5 with no third-row seating. (Other markets will get a three-row version of the V called the Prius+ or Alpha) Unlike the Chevy Volt and Nissan Leaf’s lithium-ion setups, the battery pack uses cheaper but still effective nickel-metal hydride cells. Carrying a richer load of standard and optional equipment, the Prius V likely will arrive with prices ranging from $25,000 to $35,000. This is among the first vehicles to get Toyota’s new Entune infotainment system.

The V’s core carry-over from the regular Prius is Toyota’s Hybrid Synergy Drive system. Two electric motors and a 1.8-liter four-cylinder engine deliver a combined 134 hp through a final-drive ratio changed from the standard Prius’s 3.27:1 to 3.70:1. The larger frontal area and 232 pounds of additional weight stretch the run to 60 mph to more than 10 seconds. Estimated combined-driving gas mileage falls from 50 to a still-impressive 42 mpg.

The Prius V’s principal attraction is the three-cubic-foot gain in passenger volume and the 70-percent increase in maximum cargo space provided by its 3.0-inch longer wheelbase, 6.0-inch gain in overall length, and 1.1-inch width increase. A maximum of 34 cubes of stuff will fit behind the second row, and 67 can be accommodated with those seats folded. Extra-long rear doors—we foresee problems in parking lots and plenty of V-inflicted dings—and a roof raised by 3.3 inches provide ready access to back seats that slide 7.1 inches and fold on a 60/40 split. The second-row backrests adjust 45 degrees.

The V’s structure is sound, shrewdly tuned dampers do a commendable job of managing body motion, and new dual-path front-strut mounts eliminate some of the standard Prius’s impact harshness. Wraparound front seatbacks hold securely during hard cornering.

Unfortunately, this is not the hybrid for hot dogs. The V’s electric power steering is nicely weighted but devoid of road feel. The A-pillars are thick obstructions. The full-throttle drone is such incessant torture that you will willingly take your place in the slow lane, where you will now blot out more of the road ahead than regular Prius drivers.

Prius fans, on the other hand, will probably consider the V’s additional space, respectable fuel economy, and new creature comforts exactly the sort of treat they deserve for their upstanding environmental stewardship.

2015 Toyota, Toyota Planning to Add Another 10 Hybrids Worldwide By 2015

2015 Toyota, Toyota Planning to Add Another 10 Hybrids Worldwide By 2015
This morning, Toyota released its “Global Vision” outline for the future, a document so scintillating that had he penned it, Jerry Maguire would have fired himself. In addition to a fabulous arboreal metaphor for the company’s foci, it mentions that the big T will introduce an additional 10 hybrid models worldwide by 2015. But hold on: This being a global document, many of the reported 10 models won’t be headed to the U.S. While Toyota doesn’t go into detail on what those vehicles might be,

 the recently unveiled Yaris hybrid and Prius v/Prius+ are likely included in that total. Additionally, we expect to see hybrid versions of every car in the next generation of Lexus’s lineup. (We recently discovered a copyright application for Lexus ES300h.) Toyota’s plan may be well timed—instability in the Middle East and higher demand from Asia means gas will only continue to climb in price—but fuel is going to need to cost a lot more than today’s $3.50/gallon for us to find many Toyota hybrids alluring.

Toyota FT-CH Hybrid Concept

Toyota FT-CH Hybrid Concept

Making good on its promise to proliferate its hybrid lineup with additional conventional gas-electric models even as it explores plug-ins and hydrogen-powered vehicles, Toyota is using the 2010 NAIAS in Detroit to unveil its FT-CH concept, whose latter consonants stand for “compact hybrid.”

Designed at Toyota’s facility in Nice, France, and rendered in a stunning metallic yellow, the FT-CH is an intriguing piece of design work with a stout road stance, hood-mounted headlamps, and taillights embedded in the back glass. It goes a bit heavy on the hexagons but looks cool anyway, especially in the rear three-quarter view. And even with its French Riviera flair, the FT-CH remains distinct as an alternative-fuel vehicle, and one that does so without turning our stomachs as does the doorstop-shaped Prius or Nissan’s blob-like Leaf.


What’s the point of the FT-CH? Well, according to Toyota, “The CH stands for compact hybrid . . . and it’s a concept that can best be defined by comparing it with the mid-size class Prius. The FT-CH captures the spirit and functionality of a car that thrives in the inner-city environment; sized right to be nimble, responsive, and maneuverable.”

Now, while we’re sure Toyota does not mean to imply that the FT-CH is a lithe, well-dressed urbanite that can squeeze into tight places while the porky Prius is out in the sticks bailing hay, it does call attention to the FT-CH’s weight (promised to be lighter than the Prius) and size (22 inches shorter and a bit less than an inch narrower than the Prius). Toyota also characterizes the FT-CH as having an “imaginative sense of style,” specifically within its playful, retro-futuristic Buck Rogers–style white and black interior, said to be designed with the “8-bit generation” in mind. (That means people who had/played/lusted after the original Nintendo.)

Toyota declined to provide specifics about what exactly powers the FT-CH, except to say that the car is a full hybrid and that it promises to be more fuel-efficient than the current Prius. Toyota did say that, if produced, the FT-CH would cost a bit less than the Prius and likely would be a part of a "Prius family" of cars. That means it would have a name that includes Prius, in the same way the Toyota Matrix debuted in the "Corolla family" as the Toyota Corolla Matrix. We’re pretty sure that it will be produced, at least if Toyota plans to achieve its goal of selling a million hybrids globally in “the early 2010s.

2012 Toyota Prius C

2012 Toyota Prius C

We’ve known for some time that Toyota’s Prius family would expand to include a smaller, lower-priced model, and this year’s Detroit auto show provided a vague idea of what it might look like in the form of the cool Prius C concept.

Based on these spy photos, it seems that the budget Prius is going to look less like the low-slung concept hatch and more like, well, a budget Prius. Gone are the high-set headlamps and razor-sharp front-end sculpting, replaced by conventional polygonal headlamps, a bland trapezoidal scheme for the air intakes, and the Prius’s trademark hood lump. The rear end is somewhat more interesting, chopping the Prius shape off behind the C-pillar to allow an overall length some 18 inches shorter than the standard model’s. Like the Prius C concept, the car sits rather squat between the flared rear fenders, although it is hard to tell if the rear window dips below the wiper and down toward the license plate, which would mimic the concept. In any case, most of the zest of the show car appears to be gone.


We expect that the Prius C will share at least a few—if not most—of its chassis components with the next-generation Yaris. That car’s 1.5-liter four could take over the internal-combustion role in its hybrid powertrain in place of the 1.8-liter currently installed in the Prius. As the price leader (and based on this prototype’s stark interior), we don’t expect many frills to accompany this fuel miser. We also don’t expect much in the way of fun behind the wheel, but we’d love to be proven wrong. Watch for the production Prius C to appear in showrooms within a year, likely priced about $5000 less than the Prius’s $24,280 base sticker. Such pricing would line it directly up with Honda’s equally boring Insight, which starts at $18,950.

2012 Toyota Prius Plug-In Hybrid

2012 Toyota Prius Plug-In Hybrid

Back in the waning years of the previous millennium, the Toyota Prius was born, becoming the first Toyota hybrid. Since then, of course, many other Toyota and Lexus hybrids have hit the roads, as have many from nearly every other automaker. But it’s the Prius—thanks to distinct (if unsexy) styling and industry-leading fuel economy—that remains the unofficial greenmobile for Toyota and the world.

Naturally, then, the Prius is set to become the first Toyota to make the next big leap in fuel efficiency for 2012 by going plug-in with the new Prius PHV, or “plug-in hybrid vehicle.” And since 2012 is a long way off—in our impatient minds, at least—we jumped at the chance to drive one of the 150 powder-blue preproduction Prius PHVs bound for the U.S. in 2010. All are part of Toyota’s Prius PHV pilot program that places these vehicles with various utilities and government agencies to gather data on vehicle performance.

So how exactly does it differ? Other than silver paint on the mirrors, door handles, and tailgate, the blue-and-white “PLUG-IN HYBRID” lower door decals, and a cutout in the left front fender that houses the plug, there are no visible distinctions between the regular Prius and the PHV. Ditto the interior, where a few PHV-specific info displays and a slightly raised cargo floor for the PHV’s larger battery pack represent the only notable changes.

The Prius PHV doesn’t differ much from the regular Prius from a dynamic standpoint, either. No surprise, really. The Prius PHV is essentially just a Prius whose nickel-metal hydride battery pack has been swapped for a far pricier, far heavier, and far more potent lithium-ion pack. (How potent is unclear, as Toyota won’t tell us how much it improves on the regular car’s 1.3-kWh capacity.) The new batteries can be fully charged in three hours from a simple household 110-volt outlet or an hour and a half from a 220-volt plug. The battery swap allows for more miles on electricity alone and a commensurate boost in real-world fuel economy.

And so the parallel-hybrid powertrain design, the squishy suspension setup, and the puny 15-inch wheels remain, giving the PHV the same lackluster driving characteristics as its non-plug-in sibling. That includes the way-overboosted electric power steering and a brake pedal that has yet to deliver anything close to accuracy.

Going Farther, Faster on Electrons

The most palpable difference between the standard and PHV Priuses, then, is how a judicious right foot can direct the PHV to achieve and maintain speeds of up to 62 mph using electricity alone. Like a regular Prius, though, the PHV will fire up its internal-combustion engine if you’re not careful. The PHV’s threshold is slightly higher than the regular car’s, but anything more than genteel pressure on the go pedal—say, as might be required to enter the freeway or accelerate up a slight hill—and the 98-hp, 1.8-liter four-cylinder stirs with a decidedly unsexy moan.

Keep your driving grandmotherly, though, and a Prius PHV with a full charge can travel up to 13 miles in electric mode, which becomes considerably more novel the faster one travels. Once the battery pack is depleted, the car reverts to the conventional hybrid function of the standard Prius.

Even under full throttle, the PHV remains far from quick, with a 0-to-60-mph time of 11.3 seconds, according to Toyota, versus 9.8 seconds for the non-PHV model. Blame the heavier battery pack and its ancillary hardware—which add about 330 pounds—for the more sluggish time. But then, the Prius never has been and never will be about driving delight, but rather is about maximum fuel economy. At the end of the day, the PHV proof was not in the proverbial pudding but rather neatly displayed on the dashboard. Over a short city-and-highway loop, we were powered solely by electricity about 39 percent of the time, and we averaged 56 mpg, according to the in-car readout.

Two things are worth noting here: First, in-car fuel-economy readouts are notoriously optimistic. Second, the route was heavy on hills and included several miles of freeway driving, during which we frequently exceeded 80 mph. So although that 56-mpg figure might not be entirely accurate, even with a 10-percent margin of error, we recorded impressive economy for our usage. After our stint, our driving partner took the helm for a city route and spent nearly two-thirds of the time on the electron feed, bringing overall fuel economy up to 68 mpg for the trip, an increase of more than 50 percent over the last test figure we saw in a Prius.

Plug-In Prius Won’t Be a Match for Every Environmentalist

So what’s the holdup? Bring it on, right? First, Toyota is dotting its i’s and crossing its t’s before offering the technology to customers. Toyota is using this limited PHV program to gather real-world data to see if a 13-mile electric-vehicle range is sufficient to satisfy customers or if perhaps it needs to look into more- or less-potent battery packs. Toyota is also buying time to bring the price of the Prius PHV closer to what it considers the hybrid “sweet spot” of $15,000 to $27,000, which, at this point, it surely exceeds on account of that high-tech battery.

Once such targets are met and the final product is introduced sometime next year, what will become of the standard Prius? All signs indicate that it will soldier on and keep its nickel-metal batteries for a long time. Toyota reps tell us, “In conventional hybrid vehicles, Toyota will continue to use nickel-metal hydride batteries in the near term. The technology has proved its value over 12 years of mass production and is extremely reliable.”

Furthermore, Toyota says, the viability of plug-in technology can depend on an individual customer’s geographic location, drive cycle, and access to charging facilities. We would add income to that as well, since the Prius PHV will command a sizable premium over a comparably equipped standard Prius, although if Toyota hits its price target, it won’t cost as much as the Chevrolet Volt. Assuming costs go down, Toyota says lithium-ion batteries could be considered in the future for the many other hybrids found throughout the Toyota and Lexus lineups. Still, we consider this just another rest stop on the way to bigger and better technologies.

Toyota Prius c Concept

Toyota Prius c Concept

With nearly a million Prius sales in the U.S. over the past 10 years, Toyota is looking to expand its hybrid business, and it will do so by growing the Prius family. At the 2011 Detroit auto show, the company unveiled three upcoming family members: a Prius MPV, a plug-in hybrid Prius, and this, the Prius c concept.

Toyota used last year’s Detroit auto show to introduce the idea of a smaller Prius with the FT-CH concept, and the c is a clear evolution of that design. We’re hopeful that this iteration of the concept is close to what the production car will look like because it’s surprisingly good looking for something still recognizable as a Prius. In spite of its familiar roofline and greenhouse shape, the c boasts a personality all its own with an abbreviated front end, bug-eye headlights like those on the Nissan Juke, and upright rear glass. Inside, seating for four is in concept-standard, thin-shell seats wrapped in mesh—perfect for expanding the space visually, but perhaps not the most comfortable for sitting.

Despite the similar appearance, the c is significantly smaller than the current Prius—although the company shared no technical details at this time, it did say the FT-CH was 22 inches shorter than a regular Prius. Company representatives confirmed that the c rides on a separate platform. Given the short time to market, we expect it to use a version of the existing Prius powertrain. The same powertrain powering a tidier package will pay off in efficiency; Toyota says that the c will achieve the highest efficiency of any non-plug-in hybrid. With the regular Prius rated at 51 mpg city and 48 highway, the c’s numbers should be plenty lofty.

Production Decision Made: Expect This Soon

Toyota uses the word “will” a lot in discussion of the c because, although this car is a concept, the vehicle has already been approved for production and will arrive in showrooms sometime in mid-2012. It’s unclear what the car will be called, but the Prius MPV also unveiled in Detroit will be called Prius v, for “versatility.” Whether that establishes a Prius-family naming convention—with this car carrying over the c moniker—remains to be seen. The other big unknown is cost, but we expect the c to duck below the $20,000 mark. Considering that the only other contender in the sub-$20K-hybrid space is the two-door—and multi-compromise—Honda CR-Z, the prospects look good for the c to continue the success of the Prius family.

2012 Ford Mustang , 2012 Ford Mustang Boss 302

2012 Ford Mustang , 2012 Ford Mustang Boss 302

Jim Farley, Ford’s group VP of global marketing, didn’t have to fly to California for the debut of the Mustang Boss 302. No one told him to. He came anyway. “I’ve been driving my own Mustang right through the past two Michigan winters thinking about this project,” he says. “From a business standpoint, the Boss 302 shouldn’t have happened. But it happened. My dream for the car was that it would make a lot of money for a guy street racing. It should be a car that winds up on YouTube doing something illegal. I’ve been waiting 20-plus years to launch a car like this.”


The decision to resurrect the Boss 302 was made in the darkest days of the recession. Is Ford brave or what? Especially since it’s so rare that offspring are able to match the feats of  legendary forebears, as Charlie Sheen can attest.

To eke out of the Mustang GT’s engine a bonus 32 horses, Ford created a new intake manifold with runners resembling velocity stacks. Different cylinder heads were deployed—stronger alloy and altered ports—with each head undergoing 2.5 hours of CNC massaging. The camshafts offer increased lift, the intake valves are larger, the bearings are race-spec, and the baffled pan holds 8.5 quarts of synthetic oil.

The result is 444 horsepower at 7500 rpm, a happy medium between the Mustang GT’s 412 horses and the Shelby GT500’s 550. The Boss’s V-8—unlike the brutish Shelby’s—doesn’t so often overwhelm its chassis. In fact, what you first notice—and this is very BMW-ish—is that the Boss’s engine, driveline, and suspension draw virtually no attention to each others’ eccentricities. It lends the package a gratifying sense of unity that inspires confidence.

This V-8 is so vigorous and charismatic that its likeness ought to be carved on Mount Rushmore. The engine revs nearly as quickly as you can flex your right foot, feeling as if it displaces maybe three liters. What’s more, despite all that cam, it idles as smoothly as a Camry.

Sans traction control, launching the Boss takes some practice, although never has practice been so fun. Sidestep the clutch with too many revs, and you’ll trigger axle tramp followed by a cumulous cloud of Pirelli particulates that will only swell in size all the way through second gear. The trick is to slip the clutch from about 3500 rpm, then mat the throttle when the axle says, “Yeah, I’m feelin’ settled and relaxed back here.” The result is 0 to 60 mph in 4.3 seconds—0.3 second quicker than the GT (or a Camaro SS) and only 0.2 second behind the jackhammer GT500. Once that live axle is placated . . . well, here’s the telltale statistic: From 5 to 60 mph, the Boss loses not an inch to the GT500 and is but 0.1 second behind a BMW M3. The accelerative kick flings sunglasses and coins and pens in the center bin backward against a plastic wall, sounding as if they’ve just hit the bottom of a ventilator shaft. Through the quarter-mile, the engine pulls like a Tennessee mule—no valleys, no holes—slingshotting the Boss 0.4 second ahead of the GT and only 1 mph behind the M3.

All of this is accompanied by a mellifluous, resonance-free exhaust note that is an unlikely aural confluence of, say, Lexus
IS F and Roush/Yates Sprint Cup engine. It’s a four-way exhaust—two sewer pipes astern and one per side exiting just in front of the rear wheels. A restrictor plate in each side pipe lends the Boss federal pass-by legality, but the baffles can be unbolted in less time than it takes to read this review. It’s lucky that the rumble is so rich, because the engine is seriously loud at idle.

The Boss’s suspension has likewise benefited from a lavish labor of love. Compared with the GT, it boasts stiffer springs, a fatter rear stabilizer bar, new bushings, and 19-inch Pirelli P Zeros that, at the rear, are mounted on 9.5-inch-wide wheels. What’s more, each shock offers five settings that are adjustable via screwdriver, creating the possibility of very strange chassis behavior at the hands of very strange owners. Again, is Ford brave or what? And experimenting with dampers is educational, fun, and will make you feel like Parnelli Jones’s crew chief.

The steering rack is electrically assisted and can be toggled to comfort, standard, or sport modes. We preferred the standard setting, even at the track. The other modes did nothing more than alter effort. No matter. The steering was ever accurate, progressive, and informative, with peerless interstate tracking.

At the front, four-pot Brembos clamp 14-inch vented rotors. The pads are near-race-spec compounds, although they don’t squeal, and the brake lines have been hardened to prevent expansion. On the road, pedal feel proved sublime—fairly hard but bang-on linear—and it was a cinch to modulate braking right on the threshold of the ABS. Fade? None that we encountered either during testing or during nine-tenths lapping around Laguna Seca.

As a dance partner in the hills, the Boss eagerly goes all bossa nova, laying down its prodigious power with surprising smoothness. The chassis felt remarkably balanced, usually neutral, leaning toward power oversteer only in the tightest turns. Despite its super-quick transient responses, it never felt nervous. This Mustang is so agile, so responsive to delicate inputs, that it makes the GT500 feel like a FedEx truck. The Boss’s grip almost always exceeds the driver’s courage, so feel free to ignore our lateral-grip figure, recorded on a skidpad dusted with sand. What’s more, the ultra-short-throw shifter was an ally, although its gates are so close that a clumsy upshift from second will sometimes collect fifth.

Ford has forever treated its Mustangs as blue-collar contrivances of unprepossessing heritage. The cockpit thus remains dour and rudimentary, despite the synthetic-suede-wrapped steering wheel and the machine-turned aluminum trim. The acres of coarse, pebbled-plastic surfaces, in particular, would be (and have been) rejected in far less expensive machines, notably in Ford’s own Focus. The gaping voids between the tops of the rear tires and the rolled fender lips are eyesores. The steering column doesn’t telescope. And the brake and accelerator pedals should be closer together.

The base Boss fetches $40,995, and there is only one major option: a Torsen limited-slip differential and Recaro seats (packaged together and costing $1995), plus the so-called TracKey. If you’re headed for the track—and why wouldn’t you be?—then all three are mandatory. In total, 4000 examples will be assembled, which isn’t even half of the original Boss’s two-year production. That sum includes 3250 base Bosses and 750 Laguna Seca editions.

We expected the Boss 302 to be little more than a marketing exercise in nostalgia, a somewhat more brutal, slightly faster GT, with alluring graphics but primitive predilections. It isn’t. Nose to tail, this feels like a whole new equine—thoroughly sorted, conscientiously massaged, the object of considerable forethought and ambition. As automotive resurrections go, this is a knockout that venerates the original Boss while embarrassing it objectively and subjectively in every meaningful measure. What this is, is the best Mustang ever. Continued..

2012 Chevrolet Camaro

2012 Chevrolet Camaro Gets 45th Anniversary Edition, Face Lift, and 323-hp V-6

The first time we experienced a major oil shock—the Disco-fabulous 1970s—it eviscerated the muscle-car scene, leaving us with neutered behemoths constructed with all the care of a North Korean knock-off Benz. In comparison, as today’s crude oil and prices at the pump again head north, muscle-car fans are still coming out winners. Ford’s Mustang Boss 302 is a track-attacking monster. And now Chevy is actually increasing the standard horsepower in its base V-6 2012 Camaro, from 312 to 323, while maintaining a 30-mpg highway rating.

Happy Birthday to You

For the hard-core Camaro community, though, the bigger news is the 45th Anniversary Edition Camaro. While a 45th birthday is less noteworthy than a 50th, who wants to wait another five years? By then, the Camaro will probably be a wheatgrass-electric hybrid. The 45th Anniversary package is available for the top-spec Camaro regardless of engine, and dresses up the car’s exterior with asymmetric hood and trunk-lid stripes, new-design 20-inch rims, a spoiler, and HID headlamps. Inside, the package splatters 45th Anniversary logos all over the place—seats, dash, instrument panel, steering wheel, sill plates—and trims the seats, steering wheel, shift boot, armrests, and center console in red, white, and blue contrast stitching. Disappointingly—but not surprisingly—it offers no performance upgrades. It should, however, look very sharp at the local Sunday-morning car club, alongside owners clad in Camaro hats, T-shirts, and windbreakers, clutching Camaro key chains and Camaro thermoses.

As for that smaller engine, GM’s 3.6-liter V-6 is its workhorse, powering everything from the Cadillac SRX (as of yesterday) to the Buick LaCrosse. The Camaro’s version is now dubbed LFX (in the past it was called LLT), and it makes 323 hp versus last year’s 312. The engine has longer-duration camshafts and an improved head design with larger intake valves. It drops 21 pounds, mostly thanks to a composite (read: plastic) intake manifold and lighter connecting rods, and Chevy says it is still good for 30 mpg on the highway.

On the dynamic front, engineers went to work on the chassis, sorting the stiff ride of the V-8-powered Camaro SS. The new suspension features retuned front and rear dampers, and new solid anti-roll bars front and rear. You know the drill though—we’ll believe it when we drive it.

Bye, Bye, Miss Steering-Wheel Pie

General Motors was also kind enough to clean up the Camaro’s interior for 2012. Most notably, the deep-dish steering wheel—the bane of people everywhere who like steering wheels—is gone, replaced with Chevrolet’s corporate tiller. The gauges dump the retro font from last year’s car, and the monolithic slab of cheap plastic that used to span the majority of the dash has been replaced with several smaller panels. (We just hope the quality is better.) To deal with the Camaro’s pillbox-inspired visibility problems, Chevy added a standard rear spoiler. Since there will now be absolutely no rearward visibility, a rearview camera system is available; it displays the image on a screen located in the rearview mirror.

If visibility is the only compromise we have to make with the new Camaro—and Chevrolet seems to be trying hard to provide it all in terms of power and economy—then it’s just another welcome sign that the 2010s will be a lot gentler on the auto industry than were the ’70s.

2012 Chevrolet, 2012 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1

2012 Chevrolet, 2012 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1

It’s an epic, decades-long battle waged in showrooms, at the race track, at stoplights, and in internet forums. Chevrolet versus Ford, Camaro versus Mustang. Commencing in the mid-’60s, the clash has been marked by tit-for-tat product introductions, as each brand seeks to match its competitor in every conceivable pony-car niche. Currently, the cars face off in the V-6, V-8, and droptop arenas, but the latest Camaro has ceded the high-performance crown to the Mustang and the brutal, 550-horse Shelby GT500. That ends now.

Welcome the reborn Camaro ZL1.

Open Secrets are Hard to Keep

It’s been a bit of an open secret that GM was working on a high-po Camaro to slot above the 426-hp SS model. Spy photos revealed the car’s 6.2-liter supercharged V-8, and most assumed that car would wear the storied Z28 badge. But Chevy’s product planners had something different in mind, and we now know the car will wear the reclaimed ZL1 moniker. (SLP Performance previously held the rights to the historic alphanumerics.)

A quick look back is in order. The 1969 Camaro ZL-1 was one of the ass-kickingest machines to ever roll out of Detroit. Dressed up in nothing fancier than base Camaro trim—including dog-dish hubcaps—that original ZL-1 looked like a measly six-cylinder wimp. Without even an engine-designation badge, its only real giveaway was the factory-installed cowl-induction hood. (Well, until you started it up and brought the aluminum big-block 427 to life.) The car was only available via Central Office Production Order (COPO), which installed the 427 option in the Camaro shell. Just 69 copies were built, and the ZL-1’s official 430-horse output figure was grossly underrated, mainly for insurance purposes. It was a quarter-mile king, and is among the quickest factory-built and street-legal beasts ever created.

Back in the present, the 2012 ZL1 aims to grow the legend, and it comes well prepared with a supercharged LSA V-8, borrowed from the Cadillac CTS-V. Producing an estimated 550 hp—a figure on par with the actual output of the original—and 550 lb-ft of torque from its force-fed 6.2 liters, this burly Camaro is seemingly built to terrorize drag strips rather than road courses, so perhaps ZL1 is more appropriate than Z28. (The Z28 was a racer, after all, competing and winning in Trans-Am.) A short-throw, six-speed Tremec manual is the only transmission.

Aiding driveline longevity and pavement adhesion are a beefed-up driveshaft and differential with asymmetrical half-shafts; the latter twist fat, 305-width ZL1-specific Goodyear Supercar F1 gumballs. The 20-inch forged wheels are 10 inches wide in the front and 11 in the rear, but the overall wheel-and-tire package is 22 pounds lighter than the Camaro SS's narrower 20-inch setup. We (conservatively) estimate the ZL1 will cover the 0-to-60-mph run in four seconds flat, while 0 to 100 mph should be accomplished in 9.9 seconds and the quarter-mile in 12.5. Monstrous two-piece Brembo rotors—measuring 14.6 inches in the front and 14.4 in the rear, and squeezed by six- and four-piston calipers—are the centerpieces of the braking system. The latest adaptive magnetorheological shocks sit at all four corners, and drivers can choose between Tour and Sport settings. The ZL1 also marks the introduction of a new electric power-steering system. Weight is said to be about the same as the Camaro SS's—the stronger driveline added weight, but some was pulled out with stuff like the wheels and hood, so it's roughly a wash—which puts this top-spec Camaro at 3900 pounds or so.

Many More Pieces of Flair

While the sleeper look of the original was awesome, the new ZL1 will be highly differentiated from its lesser kin. Up front, the lower fascia is dotted with brake-cooling ducts and four fog lights, and has a large splitter and a wide-mouth intake. The domed hood is aluminum with a louvered carbon-fiber center section that Chevy says helps downforce, while the rear end gets a larger integrated decklid spoiler and quad exhaust finishers. The exhaust system houses an actuated flap, as on the Corvette, that opens at higher engine speeds to both reduce back pressure and deliver a blood-boiling growl.

The cabin gets a few modest upgrades, including alloy pedal covers, a head-up display, and emblems for the headrests and door sills. Sueded material is applied to the shifter, the new flat-bottomed steering wheel, and the front-seat inserts. The auxiliary console gauges are standard on the ZL1, and feature a boost readout that we wouldn't recommend actually looking at while behind the wheel—keep your eyes on the road, please.

We're told the ZL1 will start around $47K, although Chevy could revise the pricing upward later, and it's unknown if the model will get hit with a gas-guzzler penalty. Unfortunately, we’re going to have to wait to get our hands on this brute, as it doesn't go on sale until February of 2012. So the GT500, which costs $49,495, will gallop on unchallenged for a little longer. And what about the more-racetrack-oriented Mustang Boss 302? Maybe the Z28 will find a place in Chevy’s modern lineup after all .

2012 Chevrolet, 2012 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1

2012 Chevrolet, 2012 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1

It’s an epic, decades-long battle waged in showrooms, at the race track, at stoplights, and in internet forums. Chevrolet versus Ford, Camaro versus Mustang. Commencing in the mid-’60s, the clash has been marked by tit-for-tat product introductions, as each brand seeks to match its competitor in every conceivable pony-car niche. Currently, the cars face off in the V-6, V-8, and droptop arenas, but the latest Camaro has ceded the high-performance crown to the Mustang and the brutal, 550-horse Shelby GT500. That ends now.

Welcome the reborn Camaro ZL1.

Open Secrets are Hard to Keep

It’s been a bit of an open secret that GM was working on a high-po Camaro to slot above the 426-hp SS model. Spy photos revealed the car’s 6.2-liter supercharged V-8, and most assumed that car would wear the storied Z28 badge. But Chevy’s product planners had something different in mind, and we now know the car will wear the reclaimed ZL1 moniker. (SLP Performance previously held the rights to the historic alphanumerics.)

A quick look back is in order. The 1969 Camaro ZL-1 was one of the ass-kickingest machines to ever roll out of Detroit. Dressed up in nothing fancier than base Camaro trim—including dog-dish hubcaps—that original ZL-1 looked like a measly six-cylinder wimp. Without even an engine-designation badge, its only real giveaway was the factory-installed cowl-induction hood. (Well, until you started it up and brought the aluminum big-block 427 to life.) The car was only available via Central Office Production Order (COPO), which installed the 427 option in the Camaro shell. Just 69 copies were built, and the ZL-1’s official 430-horse output figure was grossly underrated, mainly for insurance purposes. It was a quarter-mile king, and is among the quickest factory-built and street-legal beasts ever created.

Back in the present, the 2012 ZL1 aims to grow the legend, and it comes well prepared with a supercharged LSA V-8, borrowed from the Cadillac CTS-V. Producing an estimated 550 hp—a figure on par with the actual output of the original—and 550 lb-ft of torque from its force-fed 6.2 liters, this burly Camaro is seemingly built to terrorize drag strips rather than road courses, so perhaps ZL1 is more appropriate than Z28. (The Z28 was a racer, after all, competing and winning in Trans-Am.) A short-throw, six-speed Tremec manual is the only transmission.

Aiding driveline longevity and pavement adhesion are a beefed-up driveshaft and differential with asymmetrical half-shafts; the latter twist fat, 305-width ZL1-specific Goodyear Supercar F1 gumballs. The 20-inch forged wheels are 10 inches wide in the front and 11 in the rear, but the overall wheel-and-tire package is 22 pounds lighter than the Camaro SS's narrower 20-inch setup. We (conservatively) estimate the ZL1 will cover the 0-to-60-mph run in four seconds flat, while 0 to 100 mph should be accomplished in 9.9 seconds and the quarter-mile in 12.5. Monstrous two-piece Brembo rotors—measuring 14.6 inches in the front and 14.4 in the rear, and squeezed by six- and four-piston calipers—are the centerpieces of the braking system. The latest adaptive magnetorheological shocks sit at all four corners, and drivers can choose between Tour and Sport settings. The ZL1 also marks the introduction of a new electric power-steering system. Weight is said to be about the same as the Camaro SS's—the stronger driveline added weight, but some was pulled out with stuff like the wheels and hood, so it's roughly a wash—which puts this top-spec Camaro at 3900 pounds or so.

Many More Pieces of Flair

While the sleeper look of the original was awesome, the new ZL1 will be highly differentiated from its lesser kin. Up front, the lower fascia is dotted with brake-cooling ducts and four fog lights, and has a large splitter and a wide-mouth intake. The domed hood is aluminum with a louvered carbon-fiber center section that Chevy says helps downforce, while the rear end gets a larger integrated decklid spoiler and quad exhaust finishers. The exhaust system houses an actuated flap, as on the Corvette, that opens at higher engine speeds to both reduce back pressure and deliver a blood-boiling growl.

The cabin gets a few modest upgrades, including alloy pedal covers, a head-up display, and emblems for the headrests and door sills. Sueded material is applied to the shifter, the new flat-bottomed steering wheel, and the front-seat inserts. The auxiliary console gauges are standard on the ZL1, and feature a boost readout that we wouldn't recommend actually looking at while behind the wheel—keep your eyes on the road, please.

We're told the ZL1 will start around $47K, although Chevy could revise the pricing upward later, and it's unknown if the model will get hit with a gas-guzzler penalty. Unfortunately, we’re going to have to wait to get our hands on this brute, as it doesn't go on sale until February of 2012. So the GT500, which costs $49,495, will gallop on unchallenged for a little longer. And what about the more-racetrack-oriented Mustang Boss 302? Maybe the Z28 will find a place in Chevy’s modern lineup after all .

2013 Chevrolet Corvette , C7

2013 Chevrolet Corvette , C7

The pace and frequency of change to this most heroic of all Chevrolets can be charitably described as glacial, and our assessments of the changes, when they finally occur, don’t always jibe with the perceptions of the designers, builders, marketeers, and flacks.

For example, when the Corvette’s most recent major update came along for model year 2005, purporting to mark the transition from generation five (C5) to generation six, we characterized the sum of the changes as “Corvette C5 and 11/16ths.”


The members of  the Corvette tribe don’t refer to their baby in alphanumerics. It’s known internally as the Y platform and has been for decades. But that doesn’t keep the rest of the world from identifying the generations as C4, C5, and C6. Soon to become C7.

So, will the next generation merit the full seventh generational designation? Here’s what we know. Or at least think we know.

In the world of cars, perception of newness starts with what you can see. The Corvette’s looks haven’t changed much in the last two generations, covering 13 years, but we anticipate change in the C7 will be apparent at a glance, even to casual observers.

According to insider folklore, CEO Dan Akerson—GM’s fourth CEO since March 2009—attended a Corvette styling review and told design chief Ed Welburn that he thought the C6’s posterior was way too wide. Welburn reportedly said he thought so, too. As a consequence, when the C7 makes its debut in the fall of 2012, we anticipate slimmed-down rear haunches.

More startling, it seems certain that the coupe’s going-away view will feature a split rear window—à la the one-year Sting Ray coupe of 1963—though in this case it will be an optional feature. Chevrolet first signaled its interest in reviving the split window by outfitting the Stingray concept vehicle with one. Yes, that’s the one that appeared in the second Transformers movie.

We also look forward to—and fervently hope for—a thorough interior makeover. The C6 Vette has long been a respected member of the serious sports-car community, but its interior has been subpar for ­­just as long. Although interior dimensions ­probably won’t change, materials will be up­graded, and the seats—strangely deficient for years—are expected to compare favorably with the buckets found in Porsches and BMWs. Finally.

The front-engine Y platform will be essentially unchanged from the C6, with the transaxle at the rear for optimized weight distribution. As a result, dynamic elements are expected to change very little—no bad thing—although we anticipate continued improvement in steering linearity and feel. The Z06 and ZR1 will continue as the mega-performers, while Grand Sport may become the base model.

There will be changes under the hood, too. Despite the probability of slightly reduced displacement, output of the Corvette’s pushrod V-8s—naturally aspirated and supercharged (ZR1)—should be about the same as that of current engines, thanks to new direct-injection systems. Also, fuel-economy ratings may show a slight uptick. But don’t expect a hybrid version.

Pricing conjecture is just that. We look for the base Corvette coupe to start at roughly $52,000, ranging up to about $115,000 for the ZR1. If all goes according to plan, the C7 should hit dealerships in fall of 2012.

2012 Chevrolet Corvette - Z06 - ZR1

2012 Chevrolet Corvette - Z06 - ZR1

Regular (and even irregular) readers already know this, so for those who are unfamiliar with this institution, an introduction: Hi, we’re Car and Driver, and we hate the seats in the Corvette. Today, Chevy’s plastic fantastic isn’t so much a sports car as it is a budget supercar. But, in our every encounter with it, we come away just as appalled at its seats as we are amazed at its capabilities.

More Grip Inside

Although the next-generation Vette is less than two years away, Chevrolet has nonetheless made some enhancements for 2012 models that include, at last, respectable thrones—specifically, the same ones found in the Centennial Edition Corvette. (But without the microfiber suede inserts, which will be optional.) With distinct lateral and shoulder bolsters, the seats should greatly help drivers and passengers enjoy the Corvette’s formidable performance without bouncing between armrest and center console.

Additional interior touch-ups include tweaks to the steering-wheel trim and additional padding on the center console and armrest areas. With two new tweeters on the dash, the optional Bose sound system ups its speaker count to nine, and for fancier tastes, the optional leather interior now offers contrasting stitching in red, blue, or yellow. Incidentally, the brake calipers can also be ordered in red, yellow, silver, or gray. How about one of each?

More Grip on the Road

The 2012 Corvette also gets some performance-oriented upgrades as well, though the lion’s share of them go to the hard-core Z06 model, which arguably doesn’t need anything more than more grip to handle the 505 hp and 470 lb-ft of torque from its 7.0-liter V-8. Fortunately, additional grip it will get, in the form of newly available Michelin Pilot Sport Cup Zero Pressure tires. They will be available as part of the Z07 handling package for the Z06, and also for the ZR1 as part of its new PDE performance package. Measuring 285/30-19 in front and 335/25-20 in back, the new tires will help the Vette corner at more than 1.1g, according to Chevy. (That claim is not as outrageous as it may seem. We’ve recorded 1.07 in both a Z06 and a ZR1.) Also helpful are the new lightweight aluminum wheels paired with the new tires, which will be offered in satin black or machined finishes. More important, each wheel weighs about five pounds less than its counterpart on the current car.

Also new to the Z06 is Performance Traction Management, which, in a nutshell, is multiple, driver-selectable stability control programs and launch control. While we love tire smoke and yaw as much as anybody, the prospect of a more-controllable Z06 sounds good to us. Rounding out the changes for the 2012 Corvette are a newly available racing-style full-width rear spoiler for the Z06 and ZR1 as part of the Z07 and PDE packages, respectively. The Z06 also is available with a new carbon-fiber hood.

If you want to see these changes up close, your first opportunity will be a special event at the National Corvette Museum in Bowling Green, Kentucky, where production of the 2012 model commences this July. And if you’re us, you’re excited for another opportunity to belt in the test gear and head to the test track—this time, with better seats.